A proposed merger between Walt Disney and Reliance’s media assets in India is poised to face intense antitrust scrutiny due to concerns over market power, particularly in the realm of cricket broadcast rights. Legal experts have raised flags, highlighting the potential impact on advertisers by the combined entity’s robust portfolio.
The $8.5 billion merger, if approved, would catapult the conglomerate into the position of India’s leading television player, boasting a formidable arsenal of 120 channels. This would significantly outstrip local competitor Zee, which currently commands a distant 50 channels.
According to analysts at India’s Ambit Capital, the merged entity, primarily owned by billionaire tycoon Mukesh Ambani’s Reliance, is anticipated to corner a substantial 35% share of India’s TV viewership market. While the overall television landscape will come under close scrutiny by the Competition Commission of India (CCI), attention is expected to be particularly focused on the cricket segment.
Related: Anticipated Antitrust Concerns Arise in Reliance-Disney Merger
Cricket enjoys an almost religious fervor in India, with fans venerating players as deities. Companies spare no expense in acquiring broadcast rights or investing in advertisements to entice consumers to their offerings. Disney currently holds the television broadcast rights for the Indian Premier League (IPL), the world’s most lucrative cricket tournament, along with both television and streaming rights for matches organized by the International Cricket Council (ICC). Meanwhile, Reliance possesses streaming rights for the IPL and holds the Indian cricket board’s rights for all matches.
K.K Sharma, a former head of mergers at CCI, emphasized that the proposed Disney-Reliance merger is bound to attract significant regulatory attention due to the immense market power it would wield, particularly within the cricket domain. He suggested that such a consolidation would necessitate a thorough and rigorous examination by antitrust authorities.
Source: Reuters
Featured News
Supreme Court Declines to Hear Realtors’ Appeal, DOJ Antitrust Probe Moves Forward
Jan 13, 2025 by
CPI
Commerzbank Chairman Doubts Amicable Merger with UniCredit After Stake Acquisition
Jan 13, 2025 by
CPI
Senator Warren Presses HUD Nominee on Rent Price-Fixing
Jan 13, 2025 by
CPI
Epic Games CEO Accuses Tech Giants of Shifting Loyalties to Court Trump Administration
Jan 13, 2025 by
CPI
Apple’s New Developer Fees Face Renewed Scrutiny from EU Antitrust Regulators
Jan 13, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand