Antitrust, Web3 And Blockchain Technology: A Quick Look Into The Refusal To Deal Theory As Exclusionary Conduct
By: Luis Blanquez (The Antitrust Attorney)
A company utilizing blockchain technology, or potentially the blockchain itself, and holding a significant portion of the market, could potentially fall under the purview of U.S. antitrust laws as a monopolistic entity. However, it is important to note that simply being a monopoly is not inherently illegal. Instead, a company must actively employ its monopoly power to purposefully sustain that power through actions that restrict competition.
Therefore, a claim of monopolization necessitates two factors: (i) the possession of monopoly power within the relevant market, meaning the ability to control output or increase prices above what would be viable in a competitive market; and (ii) the deliberate acquisition or maintenance of that power, distinct from achieving it through superior products, business expertise, or even fortuitous circumstances. This distinction was established in United States v. Grinnell Corp., 384 U.S. 563, 570-71 (1966).
It is possible for the monopolistic entity to provide a legitimate business rationale for its behavior that hinders the success of other firms in the market. For example, the monopolist may be engaging in fair competition that benefits consumers by means of increased efficiency or offering a distinctive array of products or services…
Featured News
Google and South Carolina Clash Over State Records Demand
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
Telefonica Germany Teams Up with Amazon Web Services to Migrate 5G Customers
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
Federal Judge Grants $7.4 Million Settlement in Pork Price-Fixing Case
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
Wilson Sonsini Bolsters Antitrust and Competition Practice with Key Partner Returns
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
EU to Scrutinize Telecom Italia’s Network Sale to KKR
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Economics of Criminal Antitrust
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Navigating Economic Expert Work in Criminal Antitrust Litigation
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
The Increased Importance of Economics in Cartel Cases
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
A Law and Economics Analysis of the Antitrust Treatment of Physician Collective Price Agreements
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Information Exchange In Criminal Antitrust Cases: How Economic Testimony Can Tip The Scales
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI