Apple won a landmark court case Wednesday, July15, against the European Commission over a dispute concerning 13 billion euros ($14.9 billion) in Irish taxes, reported the Wall Street Journal.
The EU’s general court decided that the European Commission did not prove that the Irish government had given the US tech giant a tax advantage.
The commission, the executive arm of the EU, had concluded in August 2016 that the Irish government granted illegal benefits to Apple and ordered it to recover 13 billion euros in unpaid taxes.
At the time, the commission said Ireland had enabled Apple to pay “substantially less tax than other businesses over many years,” which meant that the US firm was allowed to pay an effective corporate tax rate of 1% on its European profits in 2003, which fell to 0.005% in 2014.
The Irish government and Apple decided to appeal the commission’s decision, with the company arguing the order to repay taxes “defies reality and common sense.”
Ireland, Apple and the European Commission now have two months to decide if they want to appeal the latest ruling and potentially take it to the EU’s highest tribunal.
In reaction to the court ruling, the Irish government said it has always been clear “that there was no special treatment provided to the two Apple companies” and that “the correct amount of Irish tax was charged taxation in line with normal Irish taxation rules.”
The European Commission said in a statement it “will continue to look at aggressive tax planning measures under EU State aid rules to assess whether they result in illegal State aid.” It added that it “will carefully study the judgment and reflect on possible next steps.”
Separately, the commission on Wednesday laid out several plans on how to ensure fairer taxation across the bloc, including by increasing obligations for digital platforms to report where and what amounts of tax they are paying and by facilitating joint audits across jurisdictions in the EU. Legislative proposals under these plans will be put forward in autumn, pending approval of national governments and the European Parliament.
“On the issue of corporate taxation, this [Apple tax] ruling probably makes it more urgent and more clear, the need for corporate tax reform,” said commission vice-president in charge of economic affairs, Valdis Dombrovskis. “That will be something commission will come forward [with] in our autumn package,” he said.
Featured News
Judge Mehta Questions Both Sides in Landmark Google Antitrust Case
May 2, 2024 by
CPI
FCC Urges Urgent Funding for Removal of Chinese Telecom Equipment from U.S. Networks
May 2, 2024 by
CPI
Former Pioneer CEO Facing Potential Criminal Charges For Colluding With OPEC
May 2, 2024 by
CPI
South Korea’s Antitrust Regulator Greenlights K-Pop Powerhouse Deal
May 2, 2024 by
CPI
Exxon’s Pioneer Purchase Approved, Former CEO Barred from Board
May 2, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Economics of Criminal Antitrust
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Navigating Economic Expert Work in Criminal Antitrust Litigation
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
The Increased Importance of Economics in Cartel Cases
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
A Law and Economics Analysis of the Antitrust Treatment of Physician Collective Price Agreements
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Information Exchange In Criminal Antitrust Cases: How Economic Testimony Can Tip The Scales
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI