Michael Hammock, Paul Rubin, May 20, 2011
The debate over online privacy pays too little attention to the costs and benefits of the current systems of privacy protection and advertising-supported online applications. The costs of online privacy-related harm (such as identity theft) and of protective activities are small relative to the benefits from applications that are supported by online advertising, which depends on the collection of personal information. Advocates of increased privacy focus too much on increased privacy as a solution, and not enough on alternative forms of information security. Surveys show that consumers do not like targeted advertising, or the information collection that allows it, but this may be a form of rational irrationality.That is, it may not pay for consumers to understand the costs and benefits of reduced information use.
Featured News
FTC Raises Antitrust Concerns About Law Firms’ Diversity Hiring Practices
Feb 1, 2026 by
CPI
Judge Rejects Multibillion-Dollar Penalty Request in Google Privacy Case
Feb 1, 2026 by
CPI
Iowa Attorney General Files Sweeping Lawsuit Alleging Insulin Price Manipulation
Feb 1, 2026 by
CPI
Google’s New AI Tool Draws Scrutiny From the Gaming Industry
Feb 1, 2026 by
CPI
New York Judge Throws Out Antitrust Case Against Major Academic Publishers
Feb 1, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Hub-&-Spoke Conspiracies
Jan 26, 2026 by
CPI
A Data Analytics Company as the Hub in a Hub-and-Spoke Cartel
Jan 26, 2026 by
Joseph Harrington
Hub and Spoke Cartels
Jan 26, 2026 by
Patrick Van Cayseele
Hub-and-Spoke Collusion or Vertical Exclusion? Identifying the Rim in Hub-and-Spoke Conspiracies
Jan 26, 2026 by
Rosa Abrantes-Metz, Pedro Gonzaga, Laura Ildefonso & Albert Metz
The Algorithmic Middleman in a Hub-and-Spoke Conspiracy: Divergent Court Decisions and the Expanding Patchwork of State and Local Regulations
Jan 26, 2026 by
Bradley C. Weber