Hanno Kaiser, May 20, 2011
Closed computer systems have come under attack as harmful to freedom, innovation, and competition. Open computer systems, in contrast, are said to promote such values. This article assesses the specific claim that closed systems, compared to open systems, are inherently anticompetitive. It concludes that competition policy arguments against closed systems are at best inconclusive and that closed systems should not be put in an antitrust suspect class.
Featured News
FTC Raises Antitrust Concerns About Law Firms’ Diversity Hiring Practices
Feb 1, 2026 by
CPI
Judge Rejects Multibillion-Dollar Penalty Request in Google Privacy Case
Feb 1, 2026 by
CPI
Iowa Attorney General Files Sweeping Lawsuit Alleging Insulin Price Manipulation
Feb 1, 2026 by
CPI
Google’s New AI Tool Draws Scrutiny From the Gaming Industry
Feb 1, 2026 by
CPI
New York Judge Throws Out Antitrust Case Against Major Academic Publishers
Feb 1, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Hub-&-Spoke Conspiracies
Jan 26, 2026 by
CPI
A Data Analytics Company as the Hub in a Hub-and-Spoke Cartel
Jan 26, 2026 by
Joseph Harrington
Hub and Spoke Cartels
Jan 26, 2026 by
Patrick Van Cayseele
Hub-and-Spoke Collusion or Vertical Exclusion? Identifying the Rim in Hub-and-Spoke Conspiracies
Jan 26, 2026 by
Rosa Abrantes-Metz, Pedro Gonzaga, Laura Ildefonso & Albert Metz
The Algorithmic Middleman in a Hub-and-Spoke Conspiracy: Divergent Court Decisions and the Expanding Patchwork of State and Local Regulations
Jan 26, 2026 by
Bradley C. Weber