Hanno Kaiser, May 20, 2011
Closed computer systems have come under attack as harmful to freedom, innovation, and competition. Open computer systems, in contrast, are said to promote such values. This article assesses the specific claim that closed systems, compared to open systems, are inherently anticompetitive. It concludes that competition policy arguments against closed systems are at best inconclusive and that closed systems should not be put in an antitrust suspect class.
Featured News
Anthropic Refuses Pentagon Demand to Drop AI Safeguards, $200 Million Contract at Risk
Mar 1, 2026 by
CPI
Federal Judge Halts Virginia’s Social Media Restrictions for Minors
Mar 1, 2026 by
CPI
Belgium Opens Antitrust Probe Into Google’s Online Advertising Practices
Mar 1, 2026 by
CPI
California Emerges as Key Obstacle in Paramount–Warner Bros. Merger
Mar 1, 2026 by
CPI
Utah Becomes Site of Last Flashpoint Between States and the White House Over AI Regs
Feb 27, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Behavioral Economics
Feb 22, 2026 by
CPI
Behavioral Antitrust in 2026
Feb 22, 2026 by
Maurice Stucke
Behavioral Economics in Competition Policy: Going Beyond Inertia and Framing Effects
Feb 22, 2026 by
Annemieke Tuinstra & Richard May
Agreeing to Disagree in Antitrust
Feb 22, 2026 by
Jorge Padilla
Recognizing What’s Around the Corner: Merger Control, Capabilities, and the New Nature of Potential Competition
Feb 22, 2026 by
Magdalena Kuyterink & David J. Teece