Hanno Kaiser, May 20, 2011
Closed computer systems have come under attack as harmful to freedom, innovation, and competition. Open computer systems, in contrast, are said to promote such values. This article assesses the specific claim that closed systems, compared to open systems, are inherently anticompetitive. It concludes that competition policy arguments against closed systems are at best inconclusive and that closed systems should not be put in an antitrust suspect class.
Featured News
Jiangxi Copper Finalizes SolGold Acquisition, Expanding China’s Hold on Ecuadorian Copper Projects
Mar 11, 2026 by
CPI
US Judge Rejects Drugmakers’ Bid to Disqualify Former Prosecutor in Price-Fixing Lawsuits
Mar 11, 2026 by
CPI
Spain Plans New Digital Tool to Measure ‘Footprint of Hate’ Online
Mar 11, 2026 by
CPI
Paul Hastings Hires EU Competition Partner for Brussels Office
Mar 11, 2026 by
CPI
Lawmakers Push for Better Data as AI’s Workforce Impact Comes into Focus
Mar 11, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Behavioral Economics
Feb 22, 2026 by
CPI
Behavioral Antitrust in 2026
Feb 22, 2026 by
Maurice Stucke
Behavioral Economics in Competition Policy: Going Beyond Inertia and Framing Effects
Feb 22, 2026 by
Annemieke Tuinstra & Richard May
Agreeing to Disagree in Antitrust
Feb 22, 2026 by
Jorge Padilla
Recognizing What’s Around the Corner: Merger Control, Capabilities, and the New Nature of Potential Competition
Feb 22, 2026 by
Magdalena Kuyterink & David J. Teece