Argentine president Mauricio Macri has stated his support for the Government of Buenos Aires, as it sides with the city’s taxi drivers against competition from private car transport services coordinated by the internationally notorious app Uber.
“I value the position taken by the City Government to defend our taxi drivers, who are a symbol of Argentina” said the president, speaking at the Buenos Aires community of Lavallol. However, he recognized that there is “a problem with advancing technology, which we have to adopt in the most gradual way possible in order to look out for all Argentineans.”
BA judge Victor Trionfetti issued an official caution last week, suspending Uber’s activities in the city, at the request of the local Taxi Laborer’s Union The judge advised the government to “immediately arrange the necessary measures to stop all activities carried out by the company called Uber” until a “definitive sentence” is reached.
Uber has fought back, saying its actions in Argentina are legal. “The Civil and Commercial Code (Law 26.994), with National validity, establishes in Article 1280 the legal figure of a transport contract. Based on this code, a person may transport another in exchange for payment” said the company. The “caution has no effect on Uber, as it hasn’t been sued in court and there is no final decision on the matter.”
Full Content: El Comercio
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Federal Judge Orders Google to Open Android App Store Amid Antitrust Pressure
Oct 7, 2024 by
CPI
Federal Judge Greenlights FTC’s Antitrust Lawsuit Against Amazon, Tosses Some State Claims
Oct 7, 2024 by
CPI
Supreme Court Rejects Uber and Lyft’s Appeal in California Gig Worker Suits
Oct 7, 2024 by
CPI
Supreme Court Sidesteps 5-Hour Energy Pricing Case, Allowing Antitrust Claims to Proceed
Oct 7, 2024 by
CPI
Tempur Sealy and Mattress Firm Argue FTC Proceedings Are Unconstitutional in New Suit
Oct 7, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Refusal to Deal
Sep 27, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust’s Refusal-to-Deal Doctrine: The Emperor Has No Clothes
Sep 27, 2024 by
Erik Hovenkamp
Why All Antitrust Claims are Refusal to Deal Claims and What that Means for Policy
Sep 27, 2024 by
Ramsi Woodcock
The Aspen Misadventure
Sep 27, 2024 by
Roger Blair & Holly P. Stidham
Refusal to Deal in Antitrust Law: Evolving Jurisprudence and Business Justifications in the Align Technology Case
Sep 27, 2024 by
Timothy Hsieh