The competition watchdog has questioned the commercial relationships between Qube, Brookfield Infrastructure and six international investment funds after starting a new review of the $9.05 billion Asciano takeover.
Asciano’s board has recommended that investors accept a takeover bid worth $9.28 a share that would split Asciano into three parts, with separate consortiums acquiring the company’s rail, ports and bulk and automotive ports services (BAPS) businesses.
The joint takeover bid led by Qube and Brookfield, which ended a nine-month takeover battle between the two groups for Asciano, is designed to address the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission’s (ACCC) previous concerns over an earlier proposal from Brookfield to acquire all of Asciano. The ACCC warned last year that it was unhappy with the Canadian group’s initial plan to combine its WA rail track operations with Pacific National’s rail haulage operations to create a vertically-integrated rail business.
The regulator has now revealed it has concerns over the cross-ownership stakes between some of the consortium partners in the proposed new joint takeover bid.
Full content: The Sydney Morning Herald
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
DOJ Antitrust Chief Gail Slater Assembles Veteran Team for Key Cases
Mar 16, 2025 by
CPI
UK Demands Access to Apple’s Encrypted Cloud Data, Spark Legal and Privacy Battle
Mar 16, 2025 by
CPI
Turkey Probes Netflix, Disney+, and Amazon Over Anti-Competitive Practices
Mar 16, 2025 by
CPI
Elon Musk and OpenAI Agree to Accelerate Trial Amidst Legal Battle Over AI’s For-Profit Shift
Mar 16, 2025 by
CPI
AI in Markets: A Double-Edged Sword for Competition, Says CCI Chief
Mar 16, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Self-Preferencing
Feb 26, 2025 by
CPI
Platform Self-Preferencing: Focusing the Policy Debate
Feb 26, 2025 by
Michael Katz
Weaponized Opacity: Self-Preferencing in Digital Audience Measurement
Feb 26, 2025 by
Thomas Hoppner & Philipp Westerhoff
Self-Preferencing: An Economic Literature-Based Assessment Advocating a Case-By-Case Approach and Compliance Requirements
Feb 26, 2025 by
Patrice Bougette & Frederic Marty
Self-Preferencing in Adjacent Markets
Feb 26, 2025 by
Muxin Li