Australia: Flight Centre wins price fixing of international flights battle against ACCC
Flight Centre has won an appeal overturning $11 million in penalties imposed against the company for anti-competitive practices.
The travel agency was ordered to pay the fine in March 2014 after the Federal Court found its attempts to stop three international airlines undercutting its fare offerings was anti-competitive.
But that decision was thrown out in Brisbane on Friday morning as the full bench of the Federal Court upheld an appeal from Flight Centre in relation to a six-year legal battle with the consumer watchdog.
The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission was ordered to pay costs with the travel agent to have its fine repaid, plus interest.
The case stemmed from alleged attempts by Flight Centre to control the airfares of three international carriers, Singapore Airlines, Malaysia Airlines and Emirates, between 2005 and 2009.
As the airlines increasingly offered cheaper prices on their websites than they offered to the travel agent to on-sell to its customers it put pressure on the retailer’s “price beat guarantee”.
The primary judge in the initial trial accepted the ACCC’s allegations these moves were designed not only to give the travel agent access to the cheaper prices but to stop the airlines offering fares cheaper than Flight Centre could sell and maintain a commission. The judge found this was anti-competitive because Flight Centre and the airlines were competitors in the distributions and booking market.
But on Friday judges Allsop, Davies and Wigney rejected those findings.
They found Flight Centre was actually operating as an agent for the airlines rather than a competitor against them in selling fares.
Full content: Financial Review
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Google and South Carolina Clash Over State Records Demand
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
Telefonica Germany Teams Up with Amazon Web Services to Migrate 5G Customers
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
Federal Judge Grants $7.4 Million Settlement in Pork Price-Fixing Case
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
Wilson Sonsini Bolsters Antitrust and Competition Practice with Key Partner Returns
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
EU to Scrutinize Telecom Italia’s Network Sale to KKR
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Economics of Criminal Antitrust
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Navigating Economic Expert Work in Criminal Antitrust Litigation
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
The Increased Importance of Economics in Cartel Cases
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
A Law and Economics Analysis of the Antitrust Treatment of Physician Collective Price Agreements
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Information Exchange In Criminal Antitrust Cases: How Economic Testimony Can Tip The Scales
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI