Uber Eats has committed to changing its contracts with restaurants following an investigation by the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC).
From at least 2016, Uber Eats’ contract terms made restaurants responsible for the delivery of meal orders, in circumstances where they had no control over that same delivery process once the food left their restaurant.
Uber Eats’ contract terms give it the right to refund consumers and deduct that amount from the restaurant even when the problem with the meal may not have been the fault of the restaurant.
“Following our investigation, Uber Eats has committed to changing its contract terms that we believe are unfair, because they make restaurants responsible and financially liable for elements outside of their control,” ACCC Chair Rod Sims said.
“We consider these terms to be unfair because they appear to cause a significant imbalance between restaurants and Uber Eats; the terms were not reasonably necessary to protect Uber Eats and could cause detriment to restaurants.”
Uber Eats has agreed to amend these terms; to clarify that restaurants will only be responsible for matters within their control such as incorrect food items or incorrect and missing orders.
Full Content: ACCC, Wall Street Journal
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
DOJ Antitrust Division to Skip ABA Spring Events After Lawsuit Over Foreign Aid Payments
Mar 24, 2025 by
CPI
Lawmakers Urge European Commission to Accelerate Investment in AI Chip
Mar 24, 2025 by
CPI
O’Melveny Expands M&A Team with Veteran Tech Deal-Maker
Mar 24, 2025 by
CPI
Italian Competition Authority Probes Alleged Antitrust Violations in Rail Sector
Mar 24, 2025 by
CPI
BlackRock, Vanguard, and State Street Seek Dismissal of Texas Antitrust Suit
Mar 24, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Mobile Ecosystems
Mar 24, 2025 by
CPI
Mobile Ecosystems: An Intellectual Entelechy but A Necessary Model
Mar 24, 2025 by
Alba Ribera Martinez
Creating Contestability and Fairness in Mobile Ecosystems: The Contribution of the DMA
Mar 24, 2025 by
Damien Geradin & Daniel Mandrescu
Digital Ecosystems and the Not (Yet) As Efficient Competitor Principle
Mar 24, 2025 by
Thomas Hoppner & Philipp Westerhoff
Assessing the Competition Law Scrutiny of Smart Wearables and Mobile AR/VR Devices
Mar 24, 2025 by
Kayvan Hazemi-Jebelli