![](https://www.pymnts.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/AppleEpic_2052092372-scaled-e1638524569307.jpg)
Apple vs Epic Games will go to trial in Australia next year after an Australian High Court refused Apple’s last-ditch attempt to stall the case, reported the AAP.
Tech giant Apple has lost a bid to prevent a case being heard in Australia that alleges it misused its market power over a popular online game.
The High Court in Canberra on Thursday refused Apple special leave to appeal against a Federal Court judgment that prevented the American multinational corporation from staying Epic Games’ litigation in Australian courts.
Related: Australia Moves Epic Games Antitrust Lawsuit Against Apple Forward
A court in Sydney had previously granted Apple’s request to delay the case, stating it should be filed in the U.S. as stipulated by the contract between Apple and Epic. However, a court in July overturned that ruling, and a Federal court backed up the move.
Epic Games sued Apple in Australia last year, at the time stating that “Apple’s conduct in its App Store is a misuse of market power and substantially lessens competition in-app distribution and payment processes.” CEO Tim Sweeney said the matter “goes to the heart of whether consumers and creators can do business together directly on mobile platforms or are forced to use monopoly channels against wishes and interests.”
Meanwhile, in the US, Apple has renewed a bid to stop an injunction passed down by the court in the U.S. theatre of the legal battle, asking the Ninth Circuit to stay the injunction. Apple is asking a higher court to halt a judge’s decision that will force changes to its App Store while a legal fight with Epic Games continues, reported Bloomberg.
Lawyers for the company filed Tuesday with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, seeking action by Dec. 8.
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Top Antitrust Expert Joins Cravath from Paul Weiss
Jan 21, 2025 by
CPI
CMA Chief Removed as UK Government Targets Regulatory Overhaul
Jan 21, 2025 by
CPI
Court Denies Dismissal in Crab Price-Fixing Lawsuit
Jan 21, 2025 by
CPI
TikTok Stays Online for Now: Trump Floats US Ownership Deal
Jan 21, 2025 by
CPI
Hong Kong Watchdog Unveils Compliance Tool for Small Businesses
Jan 21, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Pharmacy Benefit Managers
Jan 20, 2025 by
CPI
Untangling the PBM Mess
Jan 20, 2025 by
Kent Bernard
Using Data, Not Anecdotes, to Analyze Criticisms of Pharmacy Benefit Managers
Jan 20, 2025 by
Dennis Carlton
Vertical Integration and PBMs: What, Me Worry?
Jan 20, 2025 by
Lawton Robert Burns & Bradley Fluegel
The Economics of Benefit Management in Prescription-Drug Markets
Jan 20, 2025 by
Casey B. Mulligan