The Biden administration’s scrutiny now extends to noncompete clauses in the banking sector. The Federal Deposit Insurance(FDIC) has unveiled updated guidelines for bank mergers, proposing to outlaw noncompete agreements in employment contracts, marking the first time such measures have been introduced.
Under the proposed overhaul announced last week, deals involving banks that would hold assets exceeding $100 billion would face intensified FDIC scrutiny. Additionally, the revised guidelines explicitly prohibit the enforcement of noncompete agreements for employees at covered banks across all sizes in certain contexts. According to Bloomberg, this move aligns with a broader governmental effort to address contracts that inhibit employee mobility, as highlighted by antitrust and employment law experts.
Evan Starr, an associate professor at the University of Maryland specializing in noncompete research, emphasized the broader federal push towards enhancing labor market competitiveness. He noted, “We’ve seen a reconsideration of how various federal agencies can make labor markets more competitive. Noncompetes have been part of that discussion.”
The FDIC’s stance sets it apart from other federal banking regulators, as it becomes the lone agency among the three with authority over approving mergers to propose the avoidance of noncompete agreements for affected bank employees. Unlike the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency and the Federal Reserve, which primarily oversee larger banks and holding companies, the FDIC’s measures aim to curb noncompete clauses.
Read more: Dysfunction Junction: U.S. Merger Review Under the Biden Administration
The decision to focus on noncompetes coincides with broader regulatory actions. The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) is poised to finalize a proposal to ban noncompetes nationwide, while the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) has asserted that such agreements largely contravene federal labor law.
Evan Starr remarked to Bloomberg on the unprecedented level of regulatory scrutiny on employment contract nuances, noting, “I don’t think we’ve ever seen so much regulatory scrutiny on the fine print of employment contracts—and it’s coming from all angles.”
The move underscores the Biden administration’s commitment to fostering fair competition within the labor market and signifies a significant shift in regulatory focus within the banking sector. As discussions continue and regulatory measures take shape, the landscape of employment contracts and labor practices in the banking industry may undergo substantial transformation.
Source: News Bloomberg Law
Featured News
Judge Mehta Questions Both Sides in Landmark Google Antitrust Case
May 2, 2024 by
CPI
FCC Urges Urgent Funding for Removal of Chinese Telecom Equipment from U.S. Networks
May 2, 2024 by
CPI
Former Pioneer CEO Facing Potential Criminal Charges For Colluding With OPEC
May 2, 2024 by
CPI
South Korea’s Antitrust Regulator Greenlights K-Pop Powerhouse Deal
May 2, 2024 by
CPI
Exxon’s Pioneer Purchase Approved, Former CEO Barred from Board
May 2, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Economics of Criminal Antitrust
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Navigating Economic Expert Work in Criminal Antitrust Litigation
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
The Increased Importance of Economics in Cartel Cases
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
A Law and Economics Analysis of the Antitrust Treatment of Physician Collective Price Agreements
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Information Exchange In Criminal Antitrust Cases: How Economic Testimony Can Tip The Scales
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI