Pablo Hernández de Cos, chair of the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision and governor of the Bank of Spain, warned that fast-paced developments in decentralized finance (DeFi) and crypto assets necessitate a proactive and forward-looking regulatory and supervisory approach.
In a speech delivered at the 36th Annual General Meeting of the International Swaps and Derivatives Association in Madrid, Hernández de Cos suggested that while crypto assets and DeFi still represent less than 1% of total global financial assets and banks’ exposures are relatively limited, an appropriate response is to bring these areas within the relevant regulatory perimeter.
“Despite our better understanding of crypto assets and DeFi, the jury is still out when it comes to ascertaining how best to harness their oft-cited promises and benefits, while mitigating their risks and safeguarding financial stability,” Hernández de Cos said.
The committee’s chair also raised some doubts about the future of these digital assets and whether they will deliver what they have promised. Despite some assets being considered “stable” and “currencies,” they often fail on both counts, Hernández de Cos argued. These remarks came just a few days after some of the most popular stablecoins like TerraUSD and Tether dropped their value and it also caused a crash in some cryptocurrencies like Luna (which is associated to TerraUSD).
The Basel Committee that Hernández de Cos chairs has a mandate to strengthen the regulation and supervision of banks worldwide. While the banks’ exposures to these assets are still limited, he is calling for a forward-looking approach to regulation and supervision to ensure that prudential regulation is in place to mitigate additional risks.
Featured News
Supreme Court Rejects Uber and Lyft’s Appeal in California Gig Worker Suits
Oct 7, 2024 by
CPI
Supreme Court Sidesteps 5-Hour Energy Pricing Case, Allowing Antitrust Claims to Proceed
Oct 7, 2024 by
CPI
Tempur Sealy and Mattress Firm Argue FTC Proceedings Are Unconstitutional in New Suit
Oct 7, 2024 by
CPI
Korean Telecom Giants Face Potential $4.1 Billion Fine Over Price-Fixing Allegations
Oct 7, 2024 by
CPI
Mexico’s Antitrust Authority Targets Gruma for Market Control
Oct 7, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Refusal to Deal
Sep 27, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust’s Refusal-to-Deal Doctrine: The Emperor Has No Clothes
Sep 27, 2024 by
Erik Hovenkamp
Why All Antitrust Claims are Refusal to Deal Claims and What that Means for Policy
Sep 27, 2024 by
Ramsi Woodcock
The Aspen Misadventure
Sep 27, 2024 by
Roger Blair & Holly P. Stidham
Refusal to Deal in Antitrust Law: Evolving Jurisprudence and Business Justifications in the Align Technology Case
Sep 27, 2024 by
Timothy Hsieh