By Lisa P. Rumin and Anthony S. Ferrara (McDermott Will & Emery)
The December 2023 merger guidelines indicate a shift in perspective from the Federal Trade Commission and the U.S. Department of Justice regarding out-of-market effects, referring to competitive impacts beyond the defined market boundaries.
Firstly, the current antitrust agencies exhibit reluctance towards acknowledging efficiencies originating outside what they define as the relevant market – termed as out-of-market benefits. This stance persists even when a divestiture could maintain these efficiencies while addressing potential concerns within the relevant market.
Conversely, there is a newfound emphasis on evaluating whether market entry or efficiencies within the relevant market could detrimentally affect competition beyond its borders – referred to as out-of-market harms.
Essentially, the current FTC and DOJ consider out-of-market harms but overlook out-of-market benefits in their assessments…
Featured News
T-Mobile Faces Class-Action Lawsuit Over Sprint Merger After Appeal Denied
May 16, 2024 by
CPI
Google Faces Backlash Over Introduction of AI-Generated Summaries in Searches
May 16, 2024 by
CPI
CMA Launches Phase 2 Probe into AlphaTheta’s Acquisition of Serato
May 16, 2024 by
CPI
NFL Executive Escapes Testifying in High-Stakes Trial Over Televised Games
May 16, 2024 by
CPI
EU Consumers Lodge Complaint Against Chinese Retailer Temu Over Content Rules Breach
May 16, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Ecosystems
May 9, 2024 by
CPI
Mapping Antitrust onto Digital Ecosystems
May 9, 2024 by
CPI
Ecosystems and Competition Law: A Law and Political Economy Approach
May 9, 2024 by
CPI
Ecosystem Theories of Harm: What is Beyond the Buzzword?
May 9, 2024 by
CPI
Open Ecosystems: Benefits, Challenges, and Implications for Antitrust
May 9, 2024 by
CPI