Brazil: Federal Courts decide that CADE can’t interfere with Terminal Handling Charges
The Brazilian Antitrust Authority, CADE applied a fine to two port operator companies operating at the Port of Santos, arguing that the collection for services of segregation and delivery of containers, known by the acronym THC-2 (Terminal Handling Charge) in relation to the Customs Bonded Dockside Terminals (TRAs) at the Port of Santos is anticompetitive.
Full content: Mondaq
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Federal Judge Allows DirecTV Antitrust Case Against Nexstar to Proceed
Jul 14, 2026 by
CPI
Meta Sued Over Claims AI Tools Discriminated Against Workers With Medical Conditions
Jul 14, 2026 by
CPI
German Media Regulator Brings Google AI Overviews Under National Media Law
Jul 14, 2026 by
CPI
Asset Sales Loom Over Paramount-Warner Deal as States Escalate Antitrust Fight
Jul 14, 2026 by
CPI
Turkey Producers Face Trial as US Antitrust Litigation Narrows
Jul 14, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Due Process
Jul 7, 2026 by
CPI
The Hart‑Scott‑Rodino Act at Fifty: Procedure, Thresholds, Serial Acquisitions, and Industry Dynamics
Jul 7, 2026 by
Ginger Zhe Jin, Mario Leccese, Daniel Sokol, Liad Wagman & Mengyi Zhong
Due Process In Competition Cases: Reflections As Of 2026
Jul 7, 2026 by
Ian Forrester & Pablo Trevisan
When Referees Become Reformers: Due Process and Constitutional Considerations in Competition Market Investigations
Jul 7, 2026 by
John Taladay & Christine Ryu-Naya
Procedural Fairness in Antitrust Enforcement: A Comparative Analysis
Jul 7, 2026 by
J. Mark Gidley & Daniel Sokol