Brazil: Federal Courts decide that CADE can’t interfere with Terminal Handling Charges
The Brazilian Antitrust Authority, CADE applied a fine to two port operator companies operating at the Port of Santos, arguing that the collection for services of segregation and delivery of containers, known by the acronym THC-2 (Terminal Handling Charge) in relation to the Customs Bonded Dockside Terminals (TRAs) at the Port of Santos is anticompetitive.
Discontented with the fine imposed, both companies filed an action challenging said collection. An appeal was filed against the first instance decision, which had confirmed the antitrust authority’s decision, tried by the 4th Panel of the Regional Federal Appellate Court of the 3rd Region.
The Justices who decided the appeal resolved to annul the antitrust authority´s decision, warding off the fine applied to the port operators.
Full content: Mondaq
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Atkore Faces Shareholder Lawsuit Over Alleged Price-Fixing Scheme
Mar 19, 2025 by
CPI
US Appeals Court Upholds Ruling Denying Copyright for AI-Generated Art
Mar 19, 2025 by
CPI
Morrison Foerster Expands European Antitrust Practice
Mar 19, 2025 by
CPI
HSBC in Advanced Talks to Sell German Fund Unit to BlackFin Capital Partners
Mar 19, 2025 by
CPI
EU’s Antitrust War on Big Tech Heats Up as US Trade Disputes Grow
Mar 19, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Self-Preferencing
Feb 26, 2025 by
CPI
Platform Self-Preferencing: Focusing the Policy Debate
Feb 26, 2025 by
Michael Katz
Weaponized Opacity: Self-Preferencing in Digital Audience Measurement
Feb 26, 2025 by
Thomas Hoppner & Philipp Westerhoff
Self-Preferencing: An Economic Literature-Based Assessment Advocating a Case-By-Case Approach and Compliance Requirements
Feb 26, 2025 by
Patrice Bougette & Frederic Marty
Self-Preferencing in Adjacent Markets
Feb 26, 2025 by
Muxin Li