Visa, American Express, and Mastercard are among the payment companies that are the subject of an inquiry by Brazilian regulators.
According to a report in Bloomberg citing the Brazilian Administrative Council for Economic Defense (CADE), the Brazilian regulators are looking to see if the credit card companies ran afoul of payment network rules. Bloomberg noted that Visa stated in an annual regulatory filing that it’s also looking into the country’s Elo Network as well. Bloomberg stated said the issue has to do with a network rule that requires a merchant’s bank to get certain information from payment facilitators. Bloomberg reported that Visa stated it was cooperating with the Brazilian regulators that launched the inquiry in October. A Mastercard spokesman told Bloomberg the payment company didn’t have an immediate comment, noted the report. American Express stated it wasn’t contacted by CADE about the inquiry, but will cooperate with regulators.
The Brazilian digital payments market has exploded over the past few years, with more than thirty payment processors vying for customers business. StoneCo and PagSeguro, two of the payment processors that were among the more than thirty to attend a meeting with Brazil’s central bank, went public in the US earlier in 2018.
Late last month Visa made a strategic minority investment in Conductor, a digital payments processing technology platform in Brazil. In a press release, Visa stated the investment will go to help Conductor expand its products and to accelerate innovation in payments. The investment reinforces an existing partnership between the two, Visa noted in the press release. Conductor, which has been backed by Riverwood Capital since 2014, is a key technology processing platform for retailers, banks and other companies in Brazil, according to the press release. Visa stated its investment in Conductor is part of the payment company’s global strategy to open up the Visa ecosystem and support a broad array of new partners.
Featured News
CVS Health Explores Potential Breakup Amid Investor Pressure: Report
Oct 3, 2024 by
CPI
DirecTV Acquires Dish TV, Creating 20 Million-Subscriber Powerhouse
Oct 3, 2024 by
CPI
South Korea Fines Kakao Mobility $54.8 Million for Anti-Competitive Practices
Oct 3, 2024 by
CPI
Google Offers Settlement in India’s Antitrust Case Regarding Smart TVs
Oct 3, 2024 by
CPI
Attorney Challenges NCAA’s $2.78 Billion Settlement in Landmark Antitrust Cases
Oct 3, 2024 by
nhoch@pymnts.com
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Refusal to Deal
Sep 27, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust’s Refusal-to-Deal Doctrine: The Emperor Has No Clothes
Sep 27, 2024 by
Erik Hovenkamp
Why All Antitrust Claims are Refusal to Deal Claims and What that Means for Policy
Sep 27, 2024 by
Ramsi Woodcock
The Aspen Misadventure
Sep 27, 2024 by
Roger Blair & Holly P. Stidham
Refusal to Deal in Antitrust Law: Evolving Jurisprudence and Business Justifications in the Align Technology Case
Sep 27, 2024 by
Timothy Hsieh