Today, Broadcom, a US-based chipmaker, has vowed to appeal a ruling imposed by South Korea’s competition watchdog that penalizes the company for abusing its dominant market position in the country. This decision follows a KRW19.1 billion ($14.4 million) penalty that was imposed as a result of an investigation by the Korea Fair Trade Commission.
In a statement sent to Mobile World Live, Broadcom asserted they would appeal the FTC ruling to the Seoul High Court, commending the higher court for their previous efforts to “recognize the independence of Broadcom’s suppliers in South Korea”.
Related: South Korea Rejects Broadcom’s Proposal To Correct Unfair Practices
The FTC found that Broadcom had been using unfair practices to pressure Samsung to sign a long-term supply agreement. The investigation concluded that the chipmaker’s tactics had put considerable strain on Samsung’s operation models, necessitating the penalty.
Adding to the ongoing discourse, Broadcom quoted “the unprecedented intervention of some third parties who maneuvered local businesses in South Korea” as the main reason behind their unpopular practice.
In June, the FTC had already rejected a Broadcom proposal to remedy its wrongdoings through a KRW20 billion voluntary correction scheme. In short, the Korean Competition authorities have not been forgiving in the prosecution of this case.
Source: Mobile Worls Wild
Featured News
PepsiCo Sued Over Alleged Price Discrimination Involving Walmart
Jan 19, 2025 by
CPI
Regulators Approve Conditions for Multibillion-Dollar Oil Mergers
Jan 19, 2025 by
CPI
FTC Reaches Settlement with Private Equity Firm Over Antitrust Allegations in Texas
Jan 19, 2025 by
CPI
FTC Raises Antitrust Concerns Over Big Tech’s AI Partnerships
Jan 19, 2025 by
CPI
MultiPlan and Insurers Move to Dismiss Antitrust Allegations Amid Growing Legal Challenges
Jan 19, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand