T-Mobile’s proposed $26 billion acquisition of Sprint inched closer Wednesday, when California’s Attorney General Xavier Becerra dropped his opposition to the deal in exchange for concessions from the telecoms.
Becerra said Wednesday that the telecoms, currently the third and fourth largest in the country, had agreed to several conditions, including ones aimed at ensuring service for low-income residents. Among other specific terms, the settlement requires the merged T-Mobile/Sprint to make low-cost plans available in the state for at least five years, and to offer some no-cost service plans to 10 million qualifying low-income households.
Becerra and 12 other attorneys general challenged the merger in court last year, arguing it would lead to price hikes and worse service for consumers.
US District Court Judge Victor Marrero in the Southern District of New York sided against the attorneys general last month, ruling that the deal likely won’t lessen competition in the wireless industry. Shortly after the ruling, New York Attorney General Letitia James dropped her opposition to the deal.
The merger has been approved by the Justice Department and the Federal Communications Commission. As part of its deal with the federal government, T-Mobile and Sprint agreed to set up satellite TV company Dish as a new cellular competitor, though it will be a much smaller one.
A federal judge in Washington, D.C., must still approve the Justice Department settlement. A California utility board has also not approved the deal yet.
Featured News
Google and South Carolina Clash Over State Records Demand
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
Telefonica Germany Teams Up with Amazon Web Services to Migrate 5G Customers
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
Federal Judge Grants $7.4 Million Settlement in Pork Price-Fixing Case
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
Wilson Sonsini Bolsters Antitrust and Competition Practice with Key Partner Returns
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
EU to Scrutinize Telecom Italia’s Network Sale to KKR
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Economics of Criminal Antitrust
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Navigating Economic Expert Work in Criminal Antitrust Litigation
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
The Increased Importance of Economics in Cartel Cases
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
A Law and Economics Analysis of the Antitrust Treatment of Physician Collective Price Agreements
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Information Exchange In Criminal Antitrust Cases: How Economic Testimony Can Tip The Scales
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI