Ivory L. Bishop, Jr.; Antitrust Advocate
On Jan. 28, a federal judge in Florida dismissed without prejudice
the nation’s first antitrust suit involving cryptocurrency. The plaintiff,
United American Corporation Inc., (UAC), alleged that five entities and six
individuals conspired to hijack and centralize the Bitcoin Cash network by
combining their efforts during a crucial software upgrade vote, causing the
diminution in value of UAC’s cryptocurrency mining operation. The court’s
decision to permit UAC to amend its complaint leaves open the potential
applicability of antitrust laws in this already legally opaque industry.
Bitcoin
Cash and Blockchain
Bitcoin Cash is a form of
cryptocurrency. Cryptocurrencies are peer-to-peer versions of electronic cash.
Since there is no central financial intermediary, a decentralized “blockchain”
network of ledgers verifies and records the currency’s transactions. Blockchain
networks depend upon cryptocurrency “miners” to verify and record new
transactions. Miners compete by solving complex mathematical equations and are
compensated for their efforts with newly minted currency. UAC and the
defendants are participants in the community of software developers, miners and
exchanges that supports Bitcoin Cash.
Background
of the Case
In 2018, Bitcoin Cash was preparing for a software upgrade, which led to what is known in the industry as a “fork.” Forks allow individual miners to “vote” on the proposed changes in the rules governing aspects of the operation of the blockchain. Miners vote by implementing the relevant upgrade of their choice and then using that upgrade to “mine” the currency – voting by doing, as it were. Disagreements among miners can lead to “hard forks,” where a single currency and corresponding blockchain split into new currencies and new corresponding blockchains governed by their own respective rules…
Featured News
Google and South Carolina Clash Over State Records Demand
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
Telefonica Germany Teams Up with Amazon Web Services to Migrate 5G Customers
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
Federal Judge Grants $7.4 Million Settlement in Pork Price-Fixing Case
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
Wilson Sonsini Bolsters Antitrust and Competition Practice with Key Partner Returns
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
EU to Scrutinize Telecom Italia’s Network Sale to KKR
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Economics of Criminal Antitrust
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Navigating Economic Expert Work in Criminal Antitrust Litigation
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
The Increased Importance of Economics in Cartel Cases
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
A Law and Economics Analysis of the Antitrust Treatment of Physician Collective Price Agreements
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Information Exchange In Criminal Antitrust Cases: How Economic Testimony Can Tip The Scales
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI