In a costly mistake for the firmer competition authority of Ottawa, Canada’s Competition Tribunal ended a high-profile case by ruling against the watchdog and in favor of the Toronto Real Estate Board. According to reports, it was a filing technicality that determined the case’s result, as a suit filed by the commission against the real estate board was filed under the wrong section of the Competition Act. Interim Commissioner of Competition John Pecman said his office is “disappointed” by the decision, which was made public by the tribunal this week. According to the ruling, the allegations of anticompetitive practices were filed under the 2012 Abuse of Dominance Guidelines; the tribunal noted that the proper filing would have fallen under Section 90 of the Act, which concerns behavior by trade associations. Pecman announced that his office will review their next options.
Featured News
White House Prepares Overhaul of U.S. Cyber Rules
Dec 16, 2025 by
CPI
DirecTV Wins Second Chance in Antitrust Case Against Nexstar
Dec 16, 2025 by
CPI
Democrats Call for Tough Review of Nexstar-Tegna Merger
Dec 16, 2025 by
CPI
US FTC and States Expand Suit Accusing Uber of Deceptive Subscription Practices
Dec 16, 2025 by
CPI
US Hits Pause on Implementing UK Trade Deal Amid Disagreement on Digital Regs
Dec 16, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 16, 2025 by
CPI
Learning from Divergence: The Role of Cross-Country Comparisons in the Evaluation of the DMA
Dec 16, 2025 by
Federico Bruni
New Regulatory Tools for the EU Foreign Direct Investment Screening and Foreign Subsidies Regulation
Dec 16, 2025 by
Ioannis Kokkoris
“Suite Dreams”: Market Definition and Complementarity in the Digital Age
Dec 16, 2025 by
Romain Bizet & Matteo Foschi
The Interaction Between Competition Policy and Consumer Protection: Institutional Design, Behavioral Insights, and Emerging Challenges in Digital Markets
Dec 16, 2025 by
Alessandra Tonazzi