As Canada announced last week that its Competition Bureau is investigating some of the largest chocolate companies in the world, Mars and Nestle, over accusations of price-fixing, plaintiffs in a similar case pending within the US are hoping to get a boost from the news. While parallel criminal charges have not been filed, and lawyers in the US case still hold the burden of proof to convince the court that the alleged collusion occurred within the country, the plaintiffs are hoping that the charges within Canada will extend to the US as well. The news broke on June 6 that the Bureau filed formal charges against the companies; it additionally announced that Hershey is expected to enter a guilty plea to the Bureau for allegations of price-fixing. Mars and Nestle, however, deny any wrongdoing and plan to defend themselves against regulators.
Featured News
As Congress Considers a Ban On State AI Regs, California and NY Forge Ahead
Jun 19, 2025 by
CPI
Canada Watchdog Calls for Easing Foreign Investment Rules in Airline Sector
Jun 19, 2025 by
CPI
Litigation Finance Battle Heats Up in Tyson Foods Price-Fixing Case
Jun 19, 2025 by
CPI
Spain Weighs Additional Conditions on BBVA’s Hostile Bid for Sabadell
Jun 19, 2025 by
CPI
Japan’s TDK Buys SoftEye to Strengthen Smart Glasses Capabilities
Jun 19, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Theories of Harm
Jun 17, 2025 by
CPI
What Do We Mean by Harm to the Competitive Process?
Jun 17, 2025 by
Sean Sullivan
Is There a Better Approach to Vertical Merger Analysis?
Jun 17, 2025 by
Bob Majure & Andrew Sfekas
California’s Ill-Advised Turn Toward Europeanized Theories of Harm For Single-Firm Conduct
Jun 17, 2025 by
Geoffrey Manne, Dirk Auer & Brian Albrecht
EU Competition Policy in Support of Democracy and Sustainability: What Theories of Harm When Moving Away From the Predominance of the Consumer Welfare Paradigm?
Jun 17, 2025 by
Marios C. Iacovides