A PYMNTS Company

Canada’s Regulator Says Wage-Fixing Is Not Price Fixing

By  |  November 29, 2020

On November 27, 2020, the Canadian Competition Bureau released a statement regarding the application of the Competition Act to no-poaching, wage-fixing, and other buy-side agreements. Canadian legal and business communities have become increasingly interested in these issues since at least 2016, when American regulators indicated that buy-side agreements could attract criminal liability.

    Get the Full Story

    Complete the form to unlock this article and enjoy unlimited free access to all PYMNTS content — no additional logins required.

    yesSubscribe to our daily newsletter, PYMNTS Today.

    By completing this form, you agree to receive marketing communications from PYMNTS and to the sharing of your information with our sponsor, if applicable, in accordance with our Privacy Policy and Terms and Conditions.

    With this statement, the Bureau clarified how it will address buy-side agreements such as no-poaching or wage-fixing agreements and confirms that Canadian and American antitrust laws will treat them quite differently, according to Borden Ladner Gervais.

    Buy-side agreements not to hire employees away from competitors (no-poaching agreements) or agreements that set wages at a specific lower level or range (wage-fixing agreements) may have anti-competitive effects in the labor and related product markets, according to the statement. However, the Bureau will not consider buy-side agreements for the purchase of products and services – including employee no-poaching and wage-fixing agreements – under the criminal conspiracy and agreements regime outlined in section 45 of the Competition Act.

    Read the full statement here.

    Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.