The companies Hendaya, Alicopsa and Dipralsa – along with two others- were identified by Chilean authorities as part of a holding company controlling 26% of all Student meals in schools, with over $206,374,000 USD in revenues for a market totalling around $766 million. Jorge Bermúdez, the General Comptroller, has recognized that there is a high degree of concentration among the companies bidding for the school meals program.
Manuel Monsalve, presiding the Senate investigation commission, has said that there is enough background evidence to suspect an ongoing collusion agreement in the sector. The congressman added that the case could include conspiracy and fraud charges. However, Mr. Monsalve also recognized that the responsibility for these shortcomings should lie with the state which has failed to provide the JUNAEB, the government agency which manages the School meals program and others directed at Chile’s youth, with the necessary tools to monitor such situations.
Commenting on the announcement, the JUNAEB’s national director Marcelo Araya has said that “we proceeded to gather the background needed to bring before the National Economic Prosecutors (FNE)”, adding too that these documents will be made widely available to all relevant authorities.
Full Content: Bio Bio Chile
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
DOJ Antitrust Chief Gail Slater Assembles Veteran Team for Key Cases
Mar 16, 2025 by
CPI
UK Demands Access to Apple’s Encrypted Cloud Data, Spark Legal and Privacy Battle
Mar 16, 2025 by
CPI
Turkey Probes Netflix, Disney+, and Amazon Over Anti-Competitive Practices
Mar 16, 2025 by
CPI
Elon Musk and OpenAI Agree to Accelerate Trial Amidst Legal Battle Over AI’s For-Profit Shift
Mar 16, 2025 by
CPI
AI in Markets: A Double-Edged Sword for Competition, Says CCI Chief
Mar 16, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Self-Preferencing
Feb 26, 2025 by
CPI
Platform Self-Preferencing: Focusing the Policy Debate
Feb 26, 2025 by
Michael Katz
Weaponized Opacity: Self-Preferencing in Digital Audience Measurement
Feb 26, 2025 by
Thomas Hoppner & Philipp Westerhoff
Self-Preferencing: An Economic Literature-Based Assessment Advocating a Case-By-Case Approach and Compliance Requirements
Feb 26, 2025 by
Patrice Bougette & Frederic Marty
Self-Preferencing in Adjacent Markets
Feb 26, 2025 by
Muxin Li