Chile: Compensation for consumers affected by ‘paper cartel’ to be ready this year, says company
Paper giants CMPC has said it will make good on its promise to compensate consumers affected by its decade-long collusion with rival paper makers SCA between 2000 and 2011. The company has spent the last year collecting resources and developing the necessary methodology to determine an appropriate way to compensate these consumers, with a study commissioned to British antitrust expert Robin Noble.
“What we want is to have definitively open position, and to have it secured from now to the end of the year. It’s very unlikely that the resources will be delayed until 2017” said former Comptroller General and current CMPC Manager Ramiro Mendoza. The National Service for Consumers (SERMAC), the country’s consumer protection agency, has likewise commissioned and received their own study on the matter.
Both documents should act as a catalyst for the final stage of a long process: defining a method and/or amounts to be paid in compensation. This would make it more than a year after the SERMAC first demanded CMPC and SCA inform them of their planned compensation mechanisms – a request SCA declined.
Damages caused by the paper-makers’ collusion has been calculated at around $510 million dollars, according to the first of two reports created by Bravo Abogados, a law firm, which was included as part of a law suit filed last week against the companies and represented by consumer advocacy group CONADECUS. O these, $445 million dollars would be attributed to CMPC Tissue, while the remaining $65 million would be paid by SCA Chile.
Full Content: Economía y Negocios
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletterr for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Federal Judge Orders Google to Open Android App Store Amid Antitrust Pressure
Oct 7, 2024 by
CPI
Federal Judge Greenlights FTC’s Antitrust Lawsuit Against Amazon, Tosses Some State Claims
Oct 7, 2024 by
CPI
Supreme Court Rejects Uber and Lyft’s Appeal in California Gig Worker Suits
Oct 7, 2024 by
CPI
Supreme Court Sidesteps 5-Hour Energy Pricing Case, Allowing Antitrust Claims to Proceed
Oct 7, 2024 by
CPI
Tempur Sealy and Mattress Firm Argue FTC Proceedings Are Unconstitutional in New Suit
Oct 7, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Refusal to Deal
Sep 27, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust’s Refusal-to-Deal Doctrine: The Emperor Has No Clothes
Sep 27, 2024 by
Erik Hovenkamp
Why All Antitrust Claims are Refusal to Deal Claims and What that Means for Policy
Sep 27, 2024 by
Ramsi Woodcock
The Aspen Misadventure
Sep 27, 2024 by
Roger Blair & Holly P. Stidham
Refusal to Deal in Antitrust Law: Evolving Jurisprudence and Business Justifications in the Align Technology Case
Sep 27, 2024 by
Timothy Hsieh