G.D. Searle LLC, a Chilean subsidiary of pharma giant Pfizer, has responded to accusations by the country’s economic prosecutors, the FNE, and the country’s Tribunal for the Defense of Free Competition (TDLC), rejecting claims of market power abuse in the sale and placement of medicines containing the Celecoxib active ingredient, dominated by the brand’s Celebra formula.
The response, filed by Chilean attorney Guillermo Carey, states that “the FNE’s assessments are incorrect, and suffer from serious vices that lay bare a lack of understanding of the patent medicine system, which totally undermine the argument presented.” The statement clarifies that the conducts being denounced by the economic regulator as exclusionary and abusive are in fact “correspondent to the legitimate enforcement of G.D. Searle’s right to obtain – and then to defend- a currently valid patent protection.”
The statement emphasizes that their patent protection was granted through legitimate means. Furthermore, the company states, this protection has not only been granted in Chile, but also in several other countries such as Japan, Australia, Canada, China and India, where “it enjoys active, peaceful protection.”
Full Content: Economía y Negocios
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Pork Industry Faces Legal Challenges as Antitrust Lawsuits Against Seaboard Foods Dismissed
Oct 2, 2024 by
CPI
CMA Strengthens Investigation with Advisory Panel of Veterinary Experts
Oct 2, 2024 by
CPI
US Merchants Sue Visa, Alleging Unfair Dominance in Debit Card Market
Oct 2, 2024 by
CPI
European Commission Appoints New Chief Competition Economist
Oct 2, 2024 by
CPI
EU Commission Requests Information from YouTube, Snapchat, TikTok on Algorithm Usage
Oct 2, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Refusal to Deal
Sep 27, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust’s Refusal-to-Deal Doctrine: The Emperor Has No Clothes
Sep 27, 2024 by
Erik Hovenkamp
Why All Antitrust Claims are Refusal to Deal Claims and What that Means for Policy
Sep 27, 2024 by
Ramsi Woodcock
The Aspen Misadventure
Sep 27, 2024 by
Roger Blair & Holly P. Stidham
Refusal to Deal in Antitrust Law: Evolving Jurisprudence and Business Justifications in the Align Technology Case
Sep 27, 2024 by
Timothy Hsieh