China is reportedly looking at new regulations that would impact Alibaba and Ant Financial in an effort to boost oversight of financial holding companies.
According to a report in Reuters late last week citing state news agency Xinhua, the new regulations would be aimed at reducing the debt risks among financial holding companies including Suning.com, the retail conglomerate, and large state-backed companies in China including China Merchants Group, Shanghai International Group, and Beijing Financial Holdings Group. The aim is to have plans made for a supervision plan for financial holding companies by the first half of next year. Zhou Xuedong, director of the PBOC’s Financial Stability Bureau told Reuters that some financial holding companies had grown thanks to “barbaric” expansion. As a result, regulatory oversight is necessary. “They are large in volume with complex businesses and high association risks, and the lack of supervision would increase risks in the financial sector,” Zhou was quoted by Xinhua as saying, according to Reuters.
The report noted the PBOC has vowed to fasten the pace of its efforts to regulate the financial holding companies’ high leverage investments and at the same time strengthen the supervision of their transactions. It is embracing a “combination of macro-prudential management and micro-prudential supervision” in its regulatory approach, reported Reuters, noting that the government agency didn’t provide more details.
In June Reuters reported that Ant Financial was chosen by the PBOC to be the only FinTech to be part of a trial program in which it tested stricter regulations on financial holding companies. Reuters cited two sources at the time. This comes as Ant Financial, the Chinese FinTech giant and an affiliate of Alibaba Group, posted an earnings pre-tax loss of 2.4 billion yuan ($353 million USD) for the quarter ending September 30. The Wall Street Journal, citing Ant, reported that the company had a pre-tax profit of 5.3 billion yuan for the same quarter a year ago. It marked the third time that Ant had a quarterly loss since its unit’s result was disclosed by Alibaba in the early part of 2014. Alibaba blamed the loss on increased investments to capture growth. The WSJ quoted Alibaba, saying it “stepped up its investment to acquire more users and capture growth opportunities of the offline payment market,” which hurt results. The loss was also due in part to spending so as to expand the business internationally.
Full Content: PYMNTS
Featured News
Judge Mehta Questions Both Sides in Landmark Google Antitrust Case
May 2, 2024 by
CPI
FCC Urges Urgent Funding for Removal of Chinese Telecom Equipment from U.S. Networks
May 2, 2024 by
CPI
Former Pioneer CEO Facing Potential Criminal Charges For Colluding With OPEC
May 2, 2024 by
CPI
South Korea’s Antitrust Regulator Greenlights K-Pop Powerhouse Deal
May 2, 2024 by
CPI
Exxon’s Pioneer Purchase Approved, Former CEO Barred from Board
May 2, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Economics of Criminal Antitrust
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Navigating Economic Expert Work in Criminal Antitrust Litigation
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
The Increased Importance of Economics in Cartel Cases
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
A Law and Economics Analysis of the Antitrust Treatment of Physician Collective Price Agreements
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Information Exchange In Criminal Antitrust Cases: How Economic Testimony Can Tip The Scales
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI