
In a significant move aimed at curbing anti-competitive practices, China issued new anti-monopoly guidelines on Friday, emphasizing that industry associations must refrain from organizing firms into engaging in monopoly agreements.
The guidelines further instruct these associations to guide their members in strengthening antitrust compliance, as reported by state media CCTV.
Simultaneously, China’s Jiangsu Province has taken a crucial step in protecting trade secrets by releasing the first-ever “Guidelines for Handling Criminal Cases of Infringing upon Trade Secrets.” The announcement, made on January 8, marks a substantial development in addressing the escalating incidents of trade secret infringement, particularly triggered by employee turnover.
Currently, China’s legislation pertaining to the protection of trade secrets is confined to Article 9 of the “Anti-Unfair Competition Law” and Article 219 of the “Criminal Law.” However, the newly introduced “Guidelines” aim to provide comprehensive and explicit directives for handling criminal cases related to trade secret infringement.
Read more: An Introduction to China’s Anti-Monopoly Law
The release of these guidelines is timely, given the rising challenges and controversies associated with trade secret infringement cases. Notably, incidents linked to employee turnover have been on the upswing, making it imperative for the legal framework to adapt to these evolving circumstances.
The “Guidelines” address these concerns by outlining the overall requirements for handling criminal cases of trade secret infringement. Key aspects covered include the nature of trade secrets, acts constituting trade secret infringement, criteria for determining the severity of circumstances, and considerations for joint criminal activities. The document also specifies methods for ascertaining technical facts, appraisal procedures, and associated requirements.
The proactive stance of the “Guidelines” reflects a commitment to keeping pace with the latest developments in handling criminal cases related to trade secret infringement. By providing clear definitions and guidelines, the document is poised to significantly enhance the legal framework for safeguarding intellectual property rights in China.
Source: Reuters
Featured News
Apple, Meta Hit with Fines Under EU’s New Digital Markets Act
Apr 23, 2025 by
CPI
Boeing to Sell Key Digital Aviation Units to Thoma Bravo in $10.55 Billion Deal
Apr 22, 2025 by
CPI
Claus-Dieter Ehlermann, Key Figure in EU Antitrust Policy, Dies at 94
Apr 22, 2025 by
CPI
Instagram Co-Founder Claims Zuckerberg Starved It of Resources After Acquisition
Apr 22, 2025 by
CPI
Binance Advises Governments on Crypto Rules and Digital Asset Reserves
Apr 22, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Mergers in Digital Markets
Apr 21, 2025 by
CPI
Catching a Killer? Six “Genetic Markers” to Assess Nascent Competitor Acquisitions
Apr 21, 2025 by
John Taladay & Christine Ryu-Naya
Digital Decoded: Is There More Scope for Digital Mergers In 2025?
Apr 21, 2025 by
Colin Raftery, Michele Davis, Sarah Jensen & Martin Dickson
AI In the Mix – An Ever-Evolving Approach to Jurisdiction Over Digital Mergers in Europe
Apr 21, 2025 by
Ingrid Vandenborre & Ketevan Zukakishvili
Antitrust Enforcement Errors Due to a Failure to Understand Organizational Capabilities and Dynamic Competition
Apr 21, 2025 by
Magdalena Kuyterink & David J. Teece