China: Retail price management case highlights clashing approaches to antitrust law
A ruling by the Shanghai Intermediate People’s Court against Rainbow Medical, which alleged Johnson & Johnson hampered competition with a contract between the two parties, has been appealed to the Shanghai Higher People’s Court. According to a report, the situation is part of a larger trend of conflicting governmental approaches to retail price maintenance cases under the PRC Anti-monopoly Law. Quoted is antitrust lawyer Zhaofeng Zhou, noting that in this particular case the court used an approach “similar to the US rule of reason,” while the National Development and Reform Commission, China’s antitrust authority, used the per se illegal approach “commonly found in the EU.”
Full Content: China Law & Practice
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Charter to Acquire Cox Communications in $35 Billion Deal
May 22, 2025 by
CPI
FTC Targets Media Watchdog Over Alleged Collusion Against Musk’s X
May 22, 2025 by
CPI
FTC Drops Antitrust Case Accusing Pepsi of Squeezing Small Retailers
May 22, 2025 by
CPI
Shein Warns of Higher Costs for French Shoppers Amid EU Fee Proposal
May 22, 2025 by
CPI
DOJ Opens Antitrust Probe of Google’s AI Partnership with Character.AI
May 22, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Industrial Policy
May 21, 2025 by
CPI
Industrial Strategy and the Role of Competition – Taking a Business Lens
May 21, 2025 by
Marcus Bokkerink
Industrial Policy, Antitrust, and Economic Growth: Some Observations
May 21, 2025 by
David S. Evans
Bolder by Design: Crafting Pro-Competitive Industrial Policies For Complex Challenges
May 21, 2025 by
Antonio Capobianco & Beatriz Marques
Competition-Friendly Industrial Policy
May 21, 2025 by
Philippe Aghion, Mathias Dewatripont & Patrick Legros