Keith Hylton, Sep 01, 2005
Perhaps no area of antitrust law provokes as much controversy as predatory pricing, the theory that a firm violates the antitrust laws by setting its price too low. Under the standard definition, predatory pricing involves a strategy of cutting price below the level at which a competitor can survive in the market and then raising price to the monopoly level in a later stage known as recoupment period.
Featured News
Trump, Tech Executives Sign AI Oversight Agreement
Sep 29, 2026 by
CPI
Dutch Regulator Calls for Greater Transparency in Algorithmic Pricing
Sep 29, 2026 by
CPI
Former Trump Antitrust Chief Gail Slater to Join White & Case
Sep 29, 2026 by
CPI
Microsoft Wins Partial Dismissal of ChatGPT Users’ Antitrust Case
Sep 29, 2026 by
CPI
Google Takes EU Data-Sharing Orders to Court in Escalating DMA Fight
Sep 29, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – National Security
Sep 22, 2026 by
CPI
National Security in U.S. Antitrust Enforcement: Toward a More Disciplined Framework
Sep 22, 2026 by
Rod Rosenstein & Timothy Finley
The Department of War’s M&A Review Guidance: What Companies in the Defense Industry Need to Know
Sep 22, 2026 by
Eric Stocking & Paul Ney
National Security, Resilience and the Boundaries of Merger Control
Sep 22, 2026 by
Beatriz Marques
National Security and Competition: Building Resilient Telecommunications Networks
Sep 22, 2026 by
Roslyn Layton