Keith Hylton, Sep 01, 2005
Perhaps no area of antitrust law provokes as much controversy as predatory pricing, the theory that a firm violates the antitrust laws by setting its price too low. Under the standard definition, predatory pricing involves a strategy of cutting price below the level at which a competitor can survive in the market and then raising price to the monopoly level in a later stage known as recoupment period.
Featured News
Disney Wins Dismissal of Most Claims in FuboTV Streaming Lawsuit
Sep 9, 2026 by
CPI
Mastercard Sued by 300 Hotel Companies in UK Over Swipe Fees
Sep 9, 2026 by
CPI
Paul Weiss Faces Disqualification Bid in Sugar Price-Fixing Litigation
Sep 9, 2026 by
CPI
Amazon Pushes Back on Early Discovery in New Jersey Antitrust Case
Sep 9, 2026 by
CPI
Paramount Seeks $1.88 Billion Bond as Warner Bros. Discovery Deal Faces Delay
Sep 9, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – State Attorneys General
Aug 27, 2026 by
CPI
CPI Talks… with Jonathan Skrmetti, Attorney General of Tennessee
Aug 27, 2026 by
Jonathan Skrmetti
What the Live Nation Jury Instructions Tell Us About California’s Unfair Competition Law
Aug 27, 2026 by
Henry Hauser, Brent Nakamura, Ashley Kaplan, Brian Wang & Cari Jeffries
From Backroom Deals to Public Scrutiny: The Tunney Act’s Past, Present, and Future
Aug 27, 2026 by
Christina M. Black & Ashley A. Locke
Understanding the Fragility of Economic Concentration Through the Principles of Ecology
Aug 27, 2026 by
Alexandra Spring