Keith Hylton, Sep 01, 2005
Perhaps no area of antitrust law provokes as much controversy as predatory pricing, the theory that a firm violates the antitrust laws by setting its price too low. Under the standard definition, predatory pricing involves a strategy of cutting price below the level at which a competitor can survive in the market and then raising price to the monopoly level in a later stage known as recoupment period.
Links to Full Content
Featured News
Synopsys Proposes EU Remedies for $35 Billion Ansys Deal
Dec 10, 2024 by
CPI
Hausfeld Strengthens Competition Practice with Key Freshfields Hire
Dec 10, 2024 by
CPI
TikTok Enlists Veteran Supreme Court Advocate to Fight Potential US Ban
Dec 10, 2024 by
CPI
European Regulators Probe Secret Ad Partnership Between Google and Meta
Dec 10, 2024 by
CPI
Ribera Calls for Reform in EU Competition Policies
Dec 10, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Moats & Entrenchment
Nov 29, 2024 by
CPI
Assessing the Potential for Antitrust Moats and Trenches in the Generative AI Industry
Nov 29, 2024 by
Allison Holt, Sushrut Jain & Ashley Zhou
How SEP Hold-up Can Lead to Entrenchment
Nov 29, 2024 by
Jay Jurata, Elena Kamenir & Christie Boyden
The Role of Moats in Unlocking Economic Growth
Nov 29, 2024 by
CPI
Overcoming Moats and Entrenchment: Disruptive Innovation in Generative AI May Be More Successful than Regulation
Nov 29, 2024 by
Simon Chisholm & Charlie Whitehead