Colombian food company Alpina is facing legal action due to sustained unfair competition. The firm is accused by Swiss giant Danone of purposefully setting barriers to their entry into Colombia’s market. This is the first case of its kind to be tried in Colombia, said a spokesman for the Competition Superintendence Offices.
A press release issued by the agency mentions that evidence has been found for the constant use of this commercial ruse, which relies on systematically imitating the programs and initiatives introduced by Danone elsewhere, with the explicit aim of harming Danone’s launch plans for Colombia. This is the first time in Colombia’s legal history where an economic agent is found guilty of this ‘copy-cat’ behaviour.
Danone’s original suit, claiming damages for over $2 bn pesos, was rejected outright by the superintendence, as the company was unable to provide evidence for said damages.
Source: El Espectador
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Google and South Carolina Clash Over State Records Demand
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
Telefonica Germany Teams Up with Amazon Web Services to Migrate 5G Customers
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
Federal Judge Grants $7.4 Million Settlement in Pork Price-Fixing Case
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
Wilson Sonsini Bolsters Antitrust and Competition Practice with Key Partner Returns
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
EU to Scrutinize Telecom Italia’s Network Sale to KKR
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Economics of Criminal Antitrust
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Navigating Economic Expert Work in Criminal Antitrust Litigation
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
The Increased Importance of Economics in Cartel Cases
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
A Law and Economics Analysis of the Antitrust Treatment of Physician Collective Price Agreements
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Information Exchange In Criminal Antitrust Cases: How Economic Testimony Can Tip The Scales
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI