
Comcast must face revived claims it used its control over a regional advertising clearinghouse to monopolize “representation services” that coordinate TV ad placements in Chicago, Detroit, and Hartford,the Seventh Circuit ruled Monday.
According to Bloomberg,the antitrust lawsuit accuses Comcast of leveraging its “interconnect”—the centralized advertising marketplace—to force rival telecoms to boycott the ad coordination services offered by Viamedia, its sole competitor in that arena.
A Chicago federal judge dismissed the case in 2018, but the U.S. Court of Appeals revived it, saying the allegations of a “Hobson’s choice,” if true, demonstrate Comcast’s power to “damage competition beyond the relatively narrow markets” that are directly at issue.
“This is not a case” of anti-monopoly laws “being misused to protect weaker competitors rather than competition more generally,” Judge David Hamilton wrote, sending the case back to Chicago federal court.
Featured News
DOJ Antitrust Chief Gail Slater Assembles Veteran Team for Key Cases
Mar 16, 2025 by
CPI
UK Demands Access to Apple’s Encrypted Cloud Data, Spark Legal and Privacy Battle
Mar 16, 2025 by
CPI
Turkey Probes Netflix, Disney+, and Amazon Over Anti-Competitive Practices
Mar 16, 2025 by
CPI
Elon Musk and OpenAI Agree to Accelerate Trial Amidst Legal Battle Over AI’s For-Profit Shift
Mar 16, 2025 by
CPI
AI in Markets: A Double-Edged Sword for Competition, Says CCI Chief
Mar 16, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Self-Preferencing
Feb 26, 2025 by
CPI
Platform Self-Preferencing: Focusing the Policy Debate
Feb 26, 2025 by
Michael Katz
Weaponized Opacity: Self-Preferencing in Digital Audience Measurement
Feb 26, 2025 by
Thomas Hoppner & Philipp Westerhoff
Self-Preferencing: An Economic Literature-Based Assessment Advocating a Case-By-Case Approach and Compliance Requirements
Feb 26, 2025 by
Patrice Bougette & Frederic Marty
Self-Preferencing in Adjacent Markets
Feb 26, 2025 by
Muxin Li