Comment of the Global Antitrust Institute, George Mason University School of Law, on the Japan Fair Trade Commission’s Consultation on the Administrative Surcharge System
Posted by Social Science Research Network
Joshua D. Wright, Koren W. Wong-Ervin, Douglas H. Ginsburg & Bruce H. Kobayashi (George Mason University)
Abstract: This comment is submitted in response to the Japan Fair Trade Commission’s request for comments on its Summary of Issues Concerning the Modality of the Administrative Surcharge System. The Global Antitrust Institute’s Competition Advocacy Program provides a wide-range of recommendations to facilitate adoption of economically sound competition policy.
Featured News
French Competition Watchdog Raids EPC Groupe
May 20, 2024 by
CPI
Nippon Steel Vice Chairman to Visit US for Key Meetings in U.S. Steel Acquisition
May 20, 2024 by
CPI
Google Pays Damages to US Government in Attempt to Avoid Jury Trial in Antitrust Case
May 20, 2024 by
CPI
Nature’s Miracle and Agrify Terminate Merger Agreement Amid Challenges
May 20, 2024 by
CPI
UK’s AI Safety Institute to Open US Office Amid Growing Calls for Global Collaboration
May 20, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Ecosystems
May 9, 2024 by
CPI
Mapping Antitrust onto Digital Ecosystems
May 9, 2024 by
CPI
Ecosystems and Competition Law: A Law and Political Economy Approach
May 9, 2024 by
CPI
Ecosystem Theories of Harm: What is Beyond the Buzzword?
May 9, 2024 by
CPI
Open Ecosystems: Benefits, Challenges, and Implications for Antitrust
May 9, 2024 by
CPI