Competition Appeal Court approves Massmart acquisition by Wal-Mart, also asks for study and reinstates workers
The Competition Appeal Court has approved Wal-Mart’s acquisition of a 51 percent stake in Massmart. Judge Dennis Davis, writing for the court, found that the deal would create more benefits–in the form of lower prices and job creation–than harm. To ensure such benefits, the court ordered that a study be commissioned by three experts within a month to study the effect of the merger on small suppliers and employment, to be reviewed by the court. The court also determined that the firing of 503 Massmart workers was related to the merger, and that the workers should thus be reinstated.
Full content: Bloomberg
Related content: The Sherman Act’s Criminal Extraterritorial Reach: Unresolved Questions Raised By United States v. AU Optronics Corp (Mark Popofsky & Anthony Biagioli, Ropes & Gray)
Featured News
Google and South Carolina Clash Over State Records Demand
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
Telefonica Germany Teams Up with Amazon Web Services to Migrate 5G Customers
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
Federal Judge Grants $7.4 Million Settlement in Pork Price-Fixing Case
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
Wilson Sonsini Bolsters Antitrust and Competition Practice with Key Partner Returns
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
EU to Scrutinize Telecom Italia’s Network Sale to KKR
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Economics of Criminal Antitrust
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Navigating Economic Expert Work in Criminal Antitrust Litigation
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
The Increased Importance of Economics in Cartel Cases
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
A Law and Economics Analysis of the Antitrust Treatment of Physician Collective Price Agreements
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Information Exchange In Criminal Antitrust Cases: How Economic Testimony Can Tip The Scales
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI