Competition Appeal Court approves Massmart acquisition by Wal-Mart, also asks for study and reinstates workers
The Competition Appeal Court has approved Wal-Mart’s acquisition of a 51 percent stake in Massmart. Judge Dennis Davis, writing for the court, found that the deal would create more benefits–in the form of lower prices and job creation–than harm. To ensure such benefits, the court ordered that a study be commissioned by three experts within a month to study the effect of the merger on small suppliers and employment, to be reviewed by the court. The court also determined that the firing of 503 Massmart workers was related to the merger, and that the workers should thus be reinstated.
Full content: Bloomberg
Related content: The Sherman Act’s Criminal Extraterritorial Reach: Unresolved Questions Raised By United States v. AU Optronics Corp (Mark Popofsky & Anthony Biagioli, Ropes & Gray)
Featured News
China Summons Delivery Giants Over Unfair Competition Concerns
May 13, 2025 by
CPI
Judge Orders Sanctions Against Missouri for Noncompliance in Price-Fixing Probe
May 13, 2025 by
CPI
Confusion Reigns In AI Policy In US and Europe
May 13, 2025 by
CPI
EU Clears ADNOC’s $16.3 Billion Acquisition of Covestro
May 13, 2025 by
CPI
Spanish Antitrust Chief Says BBVA-Sabadell Merger Won’t Stifle Competition
May 13, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Mergers in Digital Markets
Apr 21, 2025 by
CPI
Catching a Killer? Six “Genetic Markers” to Assess Nascent Competitor Acquisitions
Apr 21, 2025 by
John Taladay & Christine Ryu-Naya
Digital Decoded: Is There More Scope for Digital Mergers In 2025?
Apr 21, 2025 by
Colin Raftery, Michele Davis, Sarah Jensen & Martin Dickson
AI In the Mix – An Ever-Evolving Approach to Jurisdiction Over Digital Mergers in Europe
Apr 21, 2025 by
Ingrid Vandenborre & Ketevan Zukakishvili
Antitrust Enforcement Errors Due to a Failure to Understand Organizational Capabilities and Dynamic Competition
Apr 21, 2025 by
Magdalena Kuyterink & David J. Teece