Competition Appeal Court approves Massmart acquisition by Wal-Mart, also asks for study and reinstates workers
The Competition Appeal Court has approved Wal-Mart’s acquisition of a 51 percent stake in Massmart. Judge Dennis Davis, writing for the court, found that the deal would create more benefits–in the form of lower prices and job creation–than harm. To ensure such benefits, the court ordered that a study be commissioned by three experts within a month to study the effect of the merger on small suppliers and employment, to be reviewed by the court. The court also determined that the firing of 503 Massmart workers was related to the merger, and that the workers should thus be reinstated.
Featured News
CFTC Moves To East Reporting Requirements for Prediction Markets
May 16, 2026 by
CPI
California’s Settlement With GM Signals Closer Scrutiny of Data Sales
May 16, 2026 by
CPI
Jury in Boston Set to Decide Takeda’s Fate in Amitiza Antitrust Trial
May 14, 2026 by
CPI
OnlyFans Faces New Antitrust Lawsuit
May 14, 2026 by
CPI
Americans’ Opposition to Hosting AI Data Centers Hardens, Survey Finds
May 14, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Unilateral Effects
Apr 28, 2026 by
CPI
A Net Present Value Approach to Merger Analysis
Apr 28, 2026 by
Joseph J Simons & Malcolm Coate
Generative AI and Competitive Disruption: Increasingly Relevant for Merger Analysis?
Apr 28, 2026 by
Andrea Coscelli, Emily Chissell, Nitika Bagaria & Tega Akati-Udi
Non-Price Unilateral Effects In Media Mergers
Apr 28, 2026 by
Lapo Filistrucchi & Teresa Oriani
Ecosystem Mergers and Unilateral Effects? A Framework for Assessing the Ecosystem Theory of Harm
Apr 28, 2026 by
Ethel Fonseca, George Tucker & Helder Vasconcelos