A PYMNTS Company

Competition Buzz: An Analysis of Cartel Case ‘Pharmacies’ and Its Prospects

 |  September 13, 2016

By: Crispulo Marmolejo

    Get the Full Story

    Complete the form to unlock this article and enjoy unlimited free access to all PYMNTS content — no additional logins required.

    yesSubscribe to our daily newsletter, PYMNTS Today.

    By completing this form, you agree to receive marketing communications from PYMNTS and to the sharing of your information with our sponsor, if applicable, in accordance with our Privacy Policy and Terms and Conditions.

    During 2012, the Chilean Antitrust case denominated “Pharmacies” became one of the leading in terms of investigation conducted by the Fiscalia Nacional Economica and one of the highlighted decisions of the Antitrust Court, Tribunal de Defensa de la Libre Competencia. This paper analyses the basic structure of judgement 119/2012 issued by the Tribunal, and confirmed by Chilean Supreme Court, by decision 2578-2012, which it was written by judge Sergio Muñoz, rejecting an appeal issued by Cruz Verde S.A and Salcobrand S.A. The article also studies the way by which the judges define the relevant market, and discusses some elements about parallel pricing. Furthermore, the case was controversial with respect to to the application of an agreement of conciliation with FASA S.A.

    Full Content: SSRN

    Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.