By: Alfonso Miranda Londoño & Juan D. Gutiérrez-Rodríguez
Historically, the airline industry has been characterized by the heavy regulation established by the State. In effect, during the first six decades of the existence of these services in most of the developed countries, the governments applied a strict regulation in all the aspects of the service, a strong policy of subsidies and different entry barriers of legal origin that restricted the competition in the market. However, in the seventies the government of the United States deregulated the market, liberalizing the tariffs and allowing the market to work with more flexibility. Deregulation gave antitrust law and important role in regards to the promotion and preservation of competition in the market.
In Colombia the evolution of the regulation of the airline industry has followed a similar tendency. Since the year 1992 until the issuance of the Resolution 3299 of 2007, the intervention of the Special Administrative Unit of Civil Aeronautics (AEROCIVIL) over the aeronautic tariffs consisted on their approval for each route on a maximum-minimum price basis. The issuance of the Resolution 3299 of 2007 by the AEROCIVIL, that liberated the national and international tariffs of the regular air transport of passengers had an immediate effect of increasing the competition, reflected on the substantial decrease of tariffs and the entrance of new firms.
Taking into account this context, the purpose of the paper is to present in detail the special competition regime in the Colombian aeronautical sector. The document explains the faculties of the as the competition authority of the aeronautics sector and analyzes the commercial policies of airlines and travel agencies.
Full Content: SSRN
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Google and South Carolina Clash Over State Records Demand
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
Telefonica Germany Teams Up with Amazon Web Services to Migrate 5G Customers
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
Federal Judge Grants $7.4 Million Settlement in Pork Price-Fixing Case
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
Wilson Sonsini Bolsters Antitrust and Competition Practice with Key Partner Returns
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
EU to Scrutinize Telecom Italia’s Network Sale to KKR
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Economics of Criminal Antitrust
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Navigating Economic Expert Work in Criminal Antitrust Litigation
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
The Increased Importance of Economics in Cartel Cases
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
A Law and Economics Analysis of the Antitrust Treatment of Physician Collective Price Agreements
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Information Exchange In Criminal Antitrust Cases: How Economic Testimony Can Tip The Scales
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI