- By: Ramsay Woodcock (What Am I Missing?)
New regulations have been proposed that would read New York’s law against price gouging as recommending less strict enforcement against small firms than against larger firms. I’ve argued that this confuses scarcity with monopoly.
Price gouging is the exploitation of natural scarcity to charge higher prices. Monopoly is the creation of artificial scarcity, allowing for higher prices to be charged. Big firms have the power to create artificial scarcity. But all firms can take advantage of natural scarcity to rip the public off. So there’s no good reason to apply a more lenient price gouging standard to small firms.
It turns out that New York Attorney General Letitia James is not the first person to get the distinction between natural and artificial scarcity wrong.
Hapsburg Austria did too.
Featured News
Florida Firefighters’ Pension Fund Settles Lawsuit Against Carl Icahn for $2.2 Million
May 9, 2024 by
CPI
Hermes Fights Back Against ‘Far-Fetched’ Birkin Bag Lawsuit
May 9, 2024 by
CPI
European Music Streaming Firms Rally Against Apple’s Proposed Remedies
May 9, 2024 by
CPI
Google and South Carolina Clash Over State Records Demand
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
Telefonica Germany Teams Up with Amazon Web Services to Migrate 5G Customers
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Ecosystems
May 9, 2024 by
CPI
Mapping Antitrust onto Digital Ecosystems
May 9, 2024 by
CPI
Ecosystems and Competition Law: A Law and Political Economy Approach
May 9, 2024 by
CPI
Ecosystem Theories of Harm: What is Beyond the Buzzword?
May 9, 2024 by
CPI
Open Ecosystems: Benefits, Challenges, and Implications for Antitrust
May 9, 2024 by
CPI