
- By: Ramsay Woodcock (What Am I Missing?)
New regulations have been proposed that would read New York’s law against price gouging as recommending less strict enforcement against small firms than against larger firms. I’ve argued that this confuses scarcity with monopoly.
Price gouging is the exploitation of natural scarcity to charge higher prices. Monopoly is the creation of artificial scarcity, allowing for higher prices to be charged. Big firms have the power to create artificial scarcity. But all firms can take advantage of natural scarcity to rip the public off. So there’s no good reason to apply a more lenient price gouging standard to small firms.
It turns out that New York Attorney General Letitia James is not the first person to get the distinction between natural and artificial scarcity wrong.
Hapsburg Austria did too.
Featured News
Dollar Tree to Sell Family Dollar for $1 Billion, Ending Struggling Merger
Mar 26, 2025 by
CPI
Meta Platforms Defends Use of Authors’ Works in AI Training in US Court
Mar 26, 2025 by
CPI
EU Pressed Meta to Address Antitrust Concerns Over Facebook Marketplace
Mar 26, 2025 by
CPI
UBS, Nomura, and UniCredit Fail to Overturn EU Antitrust Fines in Bond Trading Cartel Case
Mar 26, 2025 by
CPI
Coca-Cola Among Firms Targeted in EU Antitrust Raids
Mar 26, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Mobile Ecosystems
Mar 24, 2025 by
CPI
Mobile Ecosystems: An Intellectual Entelechy but A Necessary Model
Mar 24, 2025 by
Alba Ribera Martinez
Creating Contestability and Fairness in Mobile Ecosystems: The Contribution of the DMA
Mar 24, 2025 by
Damien Geradin & Daniel Mandrescu
Digital Ecosystems and the Not (Yet) As Efficient Competitor Principle
Mar 24, 2025 by
Thomas Hoppner & Philipp Westerhoff
Assessing the Competition Law Scrutiny of Smart Wearables and Mobile AR/VR Devices
Mar 24, 2025 by
Kayvan Hazemi-Jebelli