
The coronavirus pandemic has virtually eliminated shaking hands. Its economic impact now has investors doubting whether many companies which shook on mergers and acquisitions will see them completed.
Traders and fund managers say the spread between agreed deal prices and subsequent trading in the stock of the acquisition targets is the widest they have come across.
“I have been doing this for 25 years, and I have never seen panic like this coming out of merger arbitrage spreads,” said Roy Behren, managing member of Westchester Capital Management, which has US$4.1 billion in assets under management, most of it invested in merger arbitrage.
Shares of acquisition targets typically trade at a small discount to the deal price in the period between the announcement of a transaction and its completion, pricing in risks such as the possibility that regulators will block it or that the financing for it will fall through.
However, deal price spreads widened dramatically this month, even though no deal has collapsed.
This is because investors fretted that the rout in the markets and the expected economic downturn will make it more likely that acquirers will try to walk away from deals, or that they will lose the financing to complete them.
Behren said the median annualized return in the deal price spreads he tracks has jumped from single percentage points to 25%.
Shares of US jewelry chain Tiffany & Co ended trading on Tuesday, March 17, at a 14% discount to the US$135 per share all-cash deal price at which it agreed to sell itself to France’s LVMH in November. The stock was hovering at a 1% discount from the time of the deal announcement till earlier this month, offering one of the tighter spreads in merger arbitrage.
Behren said the blow-out of the spread reflected investor fears that LVMH will get cold feet about the deal, as the coronavirus pandemic weighs on consumer spending. Tiffany said on Tuesday it would temporarily close several stores, including its Fifth Avenue flagship store in New York, in an effort to contain the spread of coronavirus.
Still, Behren said he believed the spread offered a buying opportunity, because the chances of LVMH making a U-turn on the US$16.2 billion deal remained low. LVMH and Tiffany did not immediately respond to requests for comment on the anxiety of some investors over their deal.
Other deals whose spreads soared this month include US drugmaker AbbVie’s US$63 billion acquisition of Botox-maker Allergan, private equity firm Apollo Global Management’s US$6 billion leveraged buyout of US information technology equipment Tch Data Corp, and buyout firm Blackstone Group’s US$6.3 billion takeover of US energy pipeline operator Tallgrass Energy.
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Judge Partially Dismisses Investor Suit Against Google Over Ad Practices
Mar 25, 2025 by
CPI
UK Watchdog Scrutinizes Ticketmaster’s Dynamic Pricing Amid Oasis Ticket Controversy
Mar 25, 2025 by
CPI
Democratic Senators Urge White House to Seek Congressional Approval for TikTok Deadline Extension
Mar 25, 2025 by
CPI
Spain’s Antitrust Authority Probes Generali and Sanitas Over Competition Concerns
Mar 25, 2025 by
CPI
EU Lawmakers Warn Against Weakening AI Regulations
Mar 25, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Mobile Ecosystems
Mar 24, 2025 by
CPI
Mobile Ecosystems: An Intellectual Entelechy but A Necessary Model
Mar 24, 2025 by
Alba Ribera Martinez
Creating Contestability and Fairness in Mobile Ecosystems: The Contribution of the DMA
Mar 24, 2025 by
Damien Geradin & Daniel Mandrescu
Digital Ecosystems and the Not (Yet) As Efficient Competitor Principle
Mar 24, 2025 by
Thomas Hoppner & Philipp Westerhoff
Assessing the Competition Law Scrutiny of Smart Wearables and Mobile AR/VR Devices
Mar 24, 2025 by
Kayvan Hazemi-Jebelli