
On Wednesday a federal judge said the Justice Department must honor an agreement it made with the real-estate industry’s largest trade association to close an antitrust investigation.
The Justice Department investigated whether a lack of transparency to buyers around the roughly 5% to 6% commission rate for agents had caused artificially high transaction costs, despite disruptive forces such as the proliferation of online listings and venture capital-funded startups. In nearly every residential real estate transaction in the U.S. the buyers’ agents are paid by the home seller and not directly by the buyer.
In November 2020, the Justice Department reached a settlement with the National Association of Realtors, which agreed to help provide more transparency to buyers about commissions and prevent agents from marketing their services as free to buyers.
Read more: Paul, Weiss Nabs DOJ Antitrust Pro From Cravath
Months after President Biden took office, the administration withdrew from the settlement, saying it didn’t adequately protect the Justice Department’s right to investigate other conduct by the trade group that could affect competition and harm home buyers and sellers.
The National Association of Realtors went to court and asked a judge to prohibit the department’s antitrust division from reopening its investigation of industry practices that it had agreed to close as part of the settlement. U.S. District Judge Judge Timothy J. Kelly in Washington granted that request Wednesday.
“The government, like any party, must be held to the terms of its settlement agreements, whether or not a new administration likes those agreements,” Judge Kelly wrote.
Featured News
Trump Administration Steps Up Pressure On EU Digital Laws
May 18, 2025 by
CPI
Elton John Slams UK Government’s AI Copyright Plan as ‘Theft’
May 18, 2025 by
CPI
Anthropic’s Legal Team Blames AI “Hallucination” for Citation Error in Copyright Lawsuit
May 18, 2025 by
CPI
Intel Challenges €376 Million EU Antitrust Fine in Ongoing Legal Battle
May 18, 2025 by
CPI
FTC Chairman Highlights Fiscal Responsibility and Consumer Protection in House Testimony
May 18, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Healthcare Antitrust
May 14, 2025 by
CPI
Healthcare & Antitrust: What to Expect in the New Trump Administration
May 14, 2025 by
Nana Wilberforce, John W O'Toole & Sarah Pugh
Patent Gaming and Disparagement: Commission Fines Teva For Improperly Protecting Its Blockbuster Medicine
May 14, 2025 by
Blaž Višnar, Boris Andrejaš, Apostolos Baltzopoulos, Rieke Kaup, Laura Nistor & Gianluca Vassallo
Strategic Alliances in the Pharma Sector: An EU Competition Law Perspective
May 14, 2025 by
Christian Ritz & Benedikt Weiss
Monopsony Power in the Hospital Labor Market
May 14, 2025 by
Kevin E. Pflum & Christian Salas