The Competition Commission of India has issued a cease and desist order against DLF for abusing its dominant market position. Flat owners of Magnolia in Gurgaon had submitted a complaint to CCI. The investigations unit found that DLF had imposed unfair conditions in its agreement with flat buyers. In its order against DLF, CCI also required that unfair conditions be “suitably modif[ied]” within three months of the order date.
No financial penalty was imposed on DLF in this case, given the identical “nature of contravention” to the Belaire Owners Association case, where DLF was fined Rs 630 crore. The CCI believed it to be unfair to impose a second penalty on DLF for conduct in the same market.
Full content: Times of India
Related content: The CFI Decision in Microsoft: Why the European Commission’s guidelines on abuse of dominance are necessary and possible (Frederic Jenny, ESSEC Business School)
Featured News
US Consumer Watchdog Eyes Expansion of ‘Junk Fee’ Crackdown Ahead of 2024 Election
Oct 10, 2024 by
CPI
Brazil Proposes Reform to Competition Law Targeting Big Tech
Oct 10, 2024 by
CPI
Meta Enhances User Data Control, Resolving German Antitrust Dispute
Oct 10, 2024 by
CPI
X May Be Excluded from EU’s Strict Tech Rules, Sources Suggest
Oct 10, 2024 by
CPI
G7 Targets Competitive Imbalances in Semiconductor Industry
Oct 10, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Refusal to Deal
Sep 27, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust’s Refusal-to-Deal Doctrine: The Emperor Has No Clothes
Sep 27, 2024 by
Erik Hovenkamp
Why All Antitrust Claims are Refusal to Deal Claims and What that Means for Policy
Sep 27, 2024 by
Ramsi Woodcock
The Aspen Misadventure
Sep 27, 2024 by
Roger Blair & Holly P. Stidham
Refusal to Deal in Antitrust Law: Evolving Jurisprudence and Business Justifications in the Align Technology Case
Sep 27, 2024 by
Timothy Hsieh