Scott Hammond, head of criminal enforcement at the DOJ’s Antitrust Division, has outlined to Global Competition Review some of the concerns the DOJ has with prosecuting banks and financial institutions. The consideration of collateral damage was paricularly weighty, as antitrust enforcement of banks would be brought into the orbit of a market with its own regulations, as well as other enforcement agencies like the SEC.
Yet there is also the belief that financial institutions are receiving different treatment by the DOJ because of the economic climate. As such, the DOJ’s actions over the ongoing Libor probe will be watched to see if the administration’s attitude toward prosecution of banks will change or remain the same.
Source: GCR (subscription required)
Related content: Libor Litigation and the Role of Screening: The Need for Enhanced Compliance Programs (Rosa Abrantes-Metz, Global Economics Group & NYU Stern Schol of Business)
Featured News
Google and South Carolina Clash Over State Records Demand
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
Telefonica Germany Teams Up with Amazon Web Services to Migrate 5G Customers
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
Federal Judge Grants $7.4 Million Settlement in Pork Price-Fixing Case
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
Wilson Sonsini Bolsters Antitrust and Competition Practice with Key Partner Returns
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
EU to Scrutinize Telecom Italia’s Network Sale to KKR
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Economics of Criminal Antitrust
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Navigating Economic Expert Work in Criminal Antitrust Litigation
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
The Increased Importance of Economics in Cartel Cases
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
A Law and Economics Analysis of the Antitrust Treatment of Physician Collective Price Agreements
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Information Exchange In Criminal Antitrust Cases: How Economic Testimony Can Tip The Scales
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI