The Justice Department has indicated a scaled-back revision to the Hart-Scott-Rodino (HSR) filing notification program, particularly affecting companies seeking to merge. This decision, reported by Bloomberg, suggests that the finalized rule will impose fewer burdens on merging parties, likely resulting in reduced disclosure requirements.
The move comes in the wake of resistance from prominent law firms such as Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, renowned for their mergers and acquisitions expertise, along with Dechert, Foley & Lardner, and Axinn Veltrop & Harkrider, a Washington-based firm specializing in antitrust matters. Additionally, various business groups have voiced their discontent with the proposed changes, per Bloomberg Law.
Michael Keeley, the antitrust practice leader at Axinn, emphasized the significance of this development, stating, “A win for clients is a win for us.” Axinn, which handles a substantial number of HSR filings annually, highlighted the financial constraints that companies face in executing transactions.
The HSR notification filings, mandated for mergers exceeding $119.5 million in value, serve as a preliminary screening mechanism for antitrust concerns before a deal is finalized.
Andrew Forman, a deputy assistant attorney general in the DOJ’s antitrust division, announced that the Department, along with the Federal Trade Commission, is poised to unveil a final rule updating the filing process in the coming weeks. Forman indicated that the regulation will incorporate “material differences” from the initial proposal, aiming to alleviate the burden on merging parties.
The proposed overhaul, part of the Biden administration’s broader efforts to curb anti-competitive mergers, initially called for increased disclosures spanning labor market issues to a company’s prior acquisitions. Advocates of the overhaul argued that enhanced disclosure would provide regulators with deeper insights into complex mergers while appropriately shifting responsibilities from under-resourced agencies to merging entities.
Estimates from the Federal Trade Commission suggested that the proposed changes would add an average of 107 hours per filing, representing a significant increase from the existing 37 to 144 hours. A report by the Chamber of Commerce projected additional costs exceeding $1 billion, primarily borne by legal expenses.
Source: News Bloomerg Law
Featured News
Google and South Carolina Clash Over State Records Demand
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
Telefonica Germany Teams Up with Amazon Web Services to Migrate 5G Customers
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
Federal Judge Grants $7.4 Million Settlement in Pork Price-Fixing Case
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
Wilson Sonsini Bolsters Antitrust and Competition Practice with Key Partner Returns
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
EU to Scrutinize Telecom Italia’s Network Sale to KKR
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Economics of Criminal Antitrust
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Navigating Economic Expert Work in Criminal Antitrust Litigation
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
The Increased Importance of Economics in Cartel Cases
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
A Law and Economics Analysis of the Antitrust Treatment of Physician Collective Price Agreements
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Information Exchange In Criminal Antitrust Cases: How Economic Testimony Can Tip The Scales
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI