In a legal battle over the proposed merger between retail giants Kroger and Albertsons, the United States Justice Department has thrown its weight behind Colorado’s bid to thwart the $24.6 billion deal.
According to Bloomberg, Colorado initiated legal proceedings against the merger, contending that it would significantly harm competition in the grocery market. The state pursued its case independently from the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and a coalition of eight other states plus Washington, DC, which are challenging the merger in federal court in Oregon.
Kroger and Albertsons attempted to dismiss Colorado’s lawsuit, arguing that the state lacked the authority to seek a nationwide injunction. However, the Justice Department, in a filing with the Denver district court, asserted that federal laws do not preclude states from pursuing their own antitrust cases, even if they seek different remedies than those pursued at the federal level.
“The federal antitrust laws do not preempt or otherwise preclude parallel state lawsuits to protect the public,” the Justice Department stated in its filing.
Related: Kroger-Albertsons Merger Could Give Walmart Shoppers A Low-Cost Grocery Alternative
The department cited recent antitrust lawsuits against tech giants Google and Meta Platforms Inc. as examples of states independently pursuing legal action, per Bloomberg.
However, Kroger’s legal representative, Matthew Wolf, criticized the Justice Department’s position, noting what he saw as a contradiction from a previous case involving T-Mobile USA Inc. and Sprint. In that instance, the Justice Department settled with the companies, but several states sued to block the merger.
In a comment to Bloomberg, Colorado’s lawyer, Conor May, clarified that the Justice Department’s stance in the T-Mobile case pertained to federal antitrust law, whereas the current dispute relies on Colorado’s state antitrust regulations.
Judge Andrew J. Luxen, presiding over the case, has yet to indicate when he might rule on Kroger and Albertsons’ motion to dismiss Colorado’s lawsuit. However, he has scheduled a hearing in August to consider the state’s request for a preliminary injunction against the merger, citing potential harm to residents.
Source: Bloomberg
Featured News
FTC Files Suit Against Liquor Giant Southern Glazer’s Over Discount Disparities
Dec 12, 2024 by
CPI
Racing Rivals Accuse NASCAR of Retaliation in High-Stakes Antitrust Battle
Dec 12, 2024 by
CPI
Samsung Challenges Indian Antitrust Investigation, Calls Raid “Unlawful”
Dec 12, 2024 by
CPI
European Sites Criticize Google’s Compliance Efforts with DMA
Dec 12, 2024 by
CPI
Banco BPM Overcomes Regulatory Hurdle in $1.7 Billion Bid
Dec 12, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Coopetition in The Pharma Industry: Challenges for Antitrust
Dec 12, 2024 by
Juan Delgado & Lourdes Sosa
Symmetry and the Sixth Force: The Essential Role of Complements
Dec 12, 2024 by
Adam Brandenburger & Barry Nalebuff
ESG Collaborations in Light of European Antitrust Policy and Enforcement Trends
Dec 12, 2024 by
Christian Ritz, Julia Gingelmaier & Kyra Harmes
Antitrust Chronicle® – Co-opetition
Dec 11, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Moats & Entrenchment
Nov 29, 2024 by
CPI