
The DOJ withdrew three policy statements on healthcare antitrust enforcement, saying they are ‘overly permissive on certain subjects, such as information sharing,’ and that ‘a case-by-case enforcement approach’ would allow it to better evaluate healthcare mergers and competition.
The policies include a 1993 statement describing circumstances under which DOJ and the Federal Trade Commission would not challenge certain hospital mergers and health care joint ventures; a 1996 statement on health care provider networks; and a 2011 statement regarding accountable care organizations participating in the Medicare Shared Savings Program.
Related: US DOJ Seeks More Info On $8B CVS-Signify Health Deal
“AHA is deeply disappointed with the precipitous withdrawal of guidelines for hospitals and other health care providers and with DOJ’s unsupported assertion that some were ‘overly permissive,’” said AHA General Counsel Melinda Hatton. “Over the years, AHA has urged both federal antitrust agencies to modernize the guidelines to accommodate the need for more flexibility in enforcement actions to support hospitals’ ability to navigate a changing health care landscape. And, AHA was instrumental in securing appropriate ACO guidance that allowed hospitals to fully participate in that important program. Withdrawing all the guidance without consultation with the field is both unnecessary and reckless.”
The FTC is expected to follow DOJ’s lead in the coming weeks.
Featured News
DOJ Antitrust Chief Gail Slater Assembles Veteran Team for Key Cases
Mar 16, 2025 by
CPI
UK Demands Access to Apple’s Encrypted Cloud Data, Spark Legal and Privacy Battle
Mar 16, 2025 by
CPI
Turkey Probes Netflix, Disney+, and Amazon Over Anti-Competitive Practices
Mar 16, 2025 by
CPI
Elon Musk and OpenAI Agree to Accelerate Trial Amidst Legal Battle Over AI’s For-Profit Shift
Mar 16, 2025 by
CPI
AI in Markets: A Double-Edged Sword for Competition, Says CCI Chief
Mar 16, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Self-Preferencing
Feb 26, 2025 by
CPI
Platform Self-Preferencing: Focusing the Policy Debate
Feb 26, 2025 by
Michael Katz
Weaponized Opacity: Self-Preferencing in Digital Audience Measurement
Feb 26, 2025 by
Thomas Hoppner & Philipp Westerhoff
Self-Preferencing: An Economic Literature-Based Assessment Advocating a Case-By-Case Approach and Compliance Requirements
Feb 26, 2025 by
Patrice Bougette & Frederic Marty
Self-Preferencing in Adjacent Markets
Feb 26, 2025 by
Muxin Li