A group of aerospace executives failed to get a federal court to dismiss the Justice Department’s no-poach charges against them, a ruling that affirms antitrust regulators’ novel approach to labor antitrust law.
Related: Indicted Aerospace Execs Ask Judge To Dismiss DOJ’s Antitrust Suit
The Justice Department’s antitrust division plausibly argued that an agreement between a former manager of a “major” aerospace engineering company and five current and former executives of the company’s engineering suppliers—to refrain from hiring each other’s workers—inherently violated the Sherman Act, Judge Victor A. Bolden of the US District Court for the District of Connecticut said Dec. 2 in denying the defendants’ motion to dismiss.
Featured News
Google Faces Major Antitrust Battle Over $20 Billion Ad Tech Business
Sep 8, 2024 by
CPI
UK Regulator Joins US in Antitrust Battle Against Google
Sep 8, 2024 by
CPI
Nvidia and Microsoft Sued for Allegedly Undercutting AI Technology Patent Prices
Sep 5, 2024 by
CPI
White & Case Strengthens Antitrust and M&A Practices with New Partner Additions
Sep 5, 2024 by
CPI
Federal Judge Dismisses Antitrust Lawyers’ Fee Demand Over JetBlue-Spirit Deal
Sep 5, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Canada & Mexico
Sep 3, 2024 by
CPI
Competitive Convergence: Mexico’s 30-Year Quest for Antitrust Parity with its Northern Neighbor
Sep 3, 2024 by
CPI
Competition and Digital Markets in North America: A Comparative Study of Antitrust Investigations in Mexico and the United States
Sep 3, 2024 by
CPI
Recent Antitrust Development in Mexico: COFECE’s Preliminary Report on Amazon and Mercado Libre
Sep 3, 2024 by
CPI
The Cost of Making COFECE Disappear
Sep 3, 2024 by
CPI