
The DOJ’s Assistant Attorney General Jonathan Kanter is pushing for a tougher interpretation of US antitrust law. Kanter wants new laws to meet the requirements of a new digital economy, reported The New York Post.
Jonathan Kanter said US regulators had previously taken a “whack-a-mole” approach to monopolistic behavior by big tech companies. “No one ever really wins that game — the moles just keep coming,” Kanter said. “To stop them from popping up, you really need to unplug the machine. In the same way, enforcers need to unplug the monopolization machine in digital platform industries.”
Kanter said the DOJ is rethinking its reliance on enforcement based on horizontal or vertical merger status. (Buying a company in a new category is a vertical deal, such as AT&T’s one-time acquisition of WarnerMedia, whereas a horizontal merger, like T-Mobile and Sprint’s recently rejected merger, fuse direct competitors.)
For instance, Susan Athey, the DOJ Antitrust Division’s chief economist, recently co-authored a paper about the potential competition issues if a major platform were to acquire a multi-homing service, he said. People use multi-homing services to switch back and forth between multiple platforms from one centralized system or to manage accounts across multiple platforms simultaneously. If one monopolist acquired the tech, it could be a powerful tool to prevent competition even though it would be a vertical merger – which the DOJ historically interprets as kosher.
“We have been too limited by a self-imposed requirement that we use our most powerful microscopes to examine an exclusionary act before intervening to stop it,” Kanter said. “We need a wider lens, and a greater willingness to pursue and remedy all of the harmful behaviors that make up an exclusionary course of conduct.”
Rather than simply cracking down on horizontal mergers and letting vertical deals slide by, he said that antitrust enforcers should think more about how a deal or acquisition create “a flywheel effect” that reinforces a monopoly.
Kanter also emphasized how digital platforms rely on collaboration and user engagement. They aren’t installing physical networks of nationwide cables and telephone poles, as with former monopoly investigations.
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
U.K. Parliament Rejects Copyright Measure in Data Bill
May 12, 2025 by
CPI
Top Australian Law Firms Target ACCC Talent Ahead of Major Merger Reforms
May 11, 2025 by
CPI
What the Google Antitrust Trial Has Revealed So Far
May 11, 2025 by
CPI
Hamlin Remains Confident in 23XI, Front Row Antitrust Case Against NASCAR
May 11, 2025 by
CPI
Google Faces €2.97 Billion Lawsuit in Italy Over Alleged Market Abuse
May 11, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Mergers in Digital Markets
Apr 21, 2025 by
CPI
Catching a Killer? Six “Genetic Markers” to Assess Nascent Competitor Acquisitions
Apr 21, 2025 by
John Taladay & Christine Ryu-Naya
Digital Decoded: Is There More Scope for Digital Mergers In 2025?
Apr 21, 2025 by
Colin Raftery, Michele Davis, Sarah Jensen & Martin Dickson
AI In the Mix – An Ever-Evolving Approach to Jurisdiction Over Digital Mergers in Europe
Apr 21, 2025 by
Ingrid Vandenborre & Ketevan Zukakishvili
Antitrust Enforcement Errors Due to a Failure to Understand Organizational Capabilities and Dynamic Competition
Apr 21, 2025 by
Magdalena Kuyterink & David J. Teece