Ecuador’s Association of Beer makers, an industry group representing around 40 small-scale craft brewers, has raised concerns over the market conditions should an on-going merger between beer giants AB InBev (operating in Ecuador as Ambev) and SAB Miller (Cervecería Nacional). The global merger was recently given the go-ahead by Ecuador’s market regulator, the SCPM.
The merger was authorized pending 11 compromises, among which stand out the requirement to allow a third major player into the market, who may generate competitive pressure through further sales of assets, an obligation to license the Brahma brand, as well as allowing access to the merged entity’s distribution network.
The industry group’s numbers show that the Pilsener (41%), Pilsener Light (35%) and Club (20.5%) brands together represent over 97.5% of the market. Imported beers and other local brewers hold the remaining 2.5%, leaving a mere 0.052% of market share for craft beers. Regarding concerns over a possible monopoly, Daniel Cedeño Intendent for the Merger Control and Research office at the SCPM, commented that the agency will keep watch on the merger, ensuring that “it won’t generate any kind of unilateral practices, that is, any price-fixing or squeezing the supply, which can only happen when abusing monopoly powers.”
Full Content: América Economía
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Judge Dismisses Antitrust Lawsuit Against Ivy League Over Athletic Scholarships
Oct 11, 2024 by
CPI
FTC and DOJ Revamp Merger Guidelines to Identify Illegal Transactions More Efficiently
Oct 11, 2024 by
CPI
US Consumer Watchdog Eyes Expansion of ‘Junk Fee’ Crackdown Ahead of 2024 Election
Oct 10, 2024 by
CPI
Brazil Proposes Reform to Competition Law Targeting Big Tech
Oct 10, 2024 by
CPI
Meta Enhances User Data Control, Resolving German Antitrust Dispute
Oct 10, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Refusal to Deal
Sep 27, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust’s Refusal-to-Deal Doctrine: The Emperor Has No Clothes
Sep 27, 2024 by
Erik Hovenkamp
Why All Antitrust Claims are Refusal to Deal Claims and What that Means for Policy
Sep 27, 2024 by
Ramsi Woodcock
The Aspen Misadventure
Sep 27, 2024 by
Roger Blair & Holly P. Stidham
Refusal to Deal in Antitrust Law: Evolving Jurisprudence and Business Justifications in the Align Technology Case
Sep 27, 2024 by
Timothy Hsieh