Senator Elizabeth Warren, along with three other Senate Democrats, wants to bring serious scrutiny to the SPAC process, as letters they sent to the most prominent dealmakers in the space attest, Reuters reports.
Warren was joined by Tina Smith, Sherrod Brown, and Chris Van Hollen, reported PYMNTS.
“We seek information about your use of SPACs in order to understand what sort of Congressional or regulatory action may be necessary to better protect investors,” the senators wrote, per Reuters.
The aforementioned letter stated there has been “significant market dysfunction” because of SPACs, with the creation and operation of them maneuvered to “win even when investors lose.”
The reports claims insiders have taken advantage of gaps in legislative or regulatory rules at the expense of regular investors.
From there, the letter goes on to implore the officials to answer several questions related to SPACs, including every SPAC they’ve been involved in, their relationship to it, what kinds of communications they’ve had related to it, and the financial compensation and business arrangements involved in said SPAC.
SPACs, as the letters note, have become increasingly popular recently, particularly since the pandemic hit. Sponsors have stated that SPACs represent the chance for a quicker, more efficient way to go public, eschewing the normal process of an IPO.
The letters were sent to Cantor Fitzgerald’s Chief Executive Officer Howard Lutnick, former Citigroup banker Michael Klein, casino mogul and Houston Rockets owner Tilman Fertitta, and veteran investor Chamath Palihapitiya.
Additionally, they were sent to David Hamamoto, who led the SPAC that merged with EV maker Lordstown Motors Corp, and former General Motors Vice Chairman Stephen Girsky.
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Judge Dismisses Antitrust Lawsuit Against Ivy League Over Athletic Scholarships
Oct 11, 2024 by
CPI
FTC and DOJ Revamp Merger Guidelines to Identify Illegal Transactions More Efficiently
Oct 11, 2024 by
CPI
US Consumer Watchdog Eyes Expansion of ‘Junk Fee’ Crackdown Ahead of 2024 Election
Oct 10, 2024 by
CPI
Brazil Proposes Reform to Competition Law Targeting Big Tech
Oct 10, 2024 by
CPI
Meta Enhances User Data Control, Resolving German Antitrust Dispute
Oct 10, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Refusal to Deal
Sep 27, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust’s Refusal-to-Deal Doctrine: The Emperor Has No Clothes
Sep 27, 2024 by
Erik Hovenkamp
Why All Antitrust Claims are Refusal to Deal Claims and What that Means for Policy
Sep 27, 2024 by
Ramsi Woodcock
The Aspen Misadventure
Sep 27, 2024 by
Roger Blair & Holly P. Stidham
Refusal to Deal in Antitrust Law: Evolving Jurisprudence and Business Justifications in the Align Technology Case
Sep 27, 2024 by
Timothy Hsieh