A PYMNTS Company

Pacific Bell Telephone Co. v. linkLine Communications, Inc.: The Supreme Court Provides Clarity Sort Of

BY | April 14, 2009

This article is part of a Chronicle. See more from this Chronicle David Olsky, Apr 15, 2009 Much of the commentary published since thelinkLine decision has focused on the first…

This article is part of a Chronicle. See more from this Chronicle

David Olsky, Apr 15, 2009

Much of the commentary published since thelinkLine decision has focused on the first part of the Court’s ruling. Specifically the Court held that, per its earlier ruling in Verizon Communications Inc. v. Law Offices of Curtis V. Trinko, LLP, AT&T had no antitrust duty to deal with linkLine at the wholesale level. More far reaching, however, is likely the second part of the Court’s ruling t

...
THIS ARTICLE IS NOT AVAILABLE FOR IP ADDRESS 44.221.66.130

Please verify email or join us to access premium content!