The long-running proposed US$26 billion T-Mobile-Sprint merger is close to getting a go-ahead from federal regulators.
The US Justice Department’s Antitrust Chief Makan Delrahim’s scheduled testimony before the Senate’s Atitrust Subcommittee on Tuesday, July 23, was canceled on Saturday, July 20. The move shows the deal is about to close, insiders told Fox Business.
The proposed merger has had a long and tumultuous history since an agreement was first reached in April 2018.
The Federal Communications Commission originally signed off on the merger while the US Justice Department’s antitrust unit asked the agency to prevent the merger from going forward until the Department of Justice (DOJ) makes a decision.
The DOJ had threatened to file a lawsuit to block the merger if Sprint and T-Mobile didn’t reach a settlement by the week of July 23.
The DOJ previously stated it wanted Sprint and T-Mobile to sell off assets before the merger could be approved. T-Mobile sold Dish and is allowing it to use the merged companies’ network for six or seven years before it has to build its own. T-Mobile wants to give up as little as possible so that it doesn’t make Dish too good of a rival, and the DOJ wanted to ensure Dish gets enough assets so that it can compete.
In June, a group of US state attorneys general filed a lawsuit in federal court in New York to block the merger, arguing that the proposed US$26 billion deal would cost consumers more than US$4.5 billion annually. They warned that consumer prices will jump due to reduced competition.
The T-Mobile and Sprint merger means the US wireless market would be dominated by three national players, putting the new company second to Verizon and ahead of AT&T.
Full Content: PYMNTS
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
European Commission Orders Lufthansa to Support Condor’s Frankfurt-New York Route
Jan 15, 2025 by
CPI
No Pause for Big Tech Probes: EU Keeps Pressure on as Trump Arrives
Jan 15, 2025 by
CPI
Meta Faces Roadblocks in India After Antitrust Ruling, Warns of Feature Rollbacks
Jan 15, 2025 by
CPI
Massachusetts AG Sues Insulin Makers and PBMs Over Alleged Price-Fixing Scheme
Jan 14, 2025 by
CPI
Apple and Amazon Avoid Mass Lawsuit in UK Over Alleged Collusion
Jan 14, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand