Enforcement of the EU Competition Rules in Romania: Application of the ‘Effect on Trade’ Concept in the Enforcement Practice of the Romanian Competition Council
Posted by Social Science Research Network
The Actavis Inference: Theory and Practice– Alexandr Svetlicinii (University of Macau)
Abstract: The decade of enforcement of EU competition rules under the decentralized enforcement system introduced by the Regulation 1/2003 has turned the national competition authorities (NCAs) into the primary enforcers of the Articles 101 and 102 TFEU. Despite the substantial number of investigations and infringement decisions reported within the European Competition Network, the enforcement record of individual NCAs displays substantial divergences in relation to the number of infringement decisions applying EU competition rules and the ratio of EU competition law cases in relation to the application of national competition rules. While the reasons for the divergence of the enforcement record across the EU are numerous, one of the factors that can have a decisive influence on the volume of EU competition law cases pursued by the NCAs is the application of the ‘effect on trade’ concept when determining the applicability of EU competition rules. In contrast to the enforcement record of the majority of ‘new’ Member States, Romanian NCA accumulated substantial experience in conducting the ‘effect on trade’ assessment when investigating potential antitrust infringements in the domestic markets. Present paper provides a critical overview of the enforcement practice of the Romanian Competition Council in this regard. While the paper was not intended as a comparative study, the incentives derived from the Romanian enforcement experience could serve as a point of reference for other EU jurisdictions, which display a diverging record in relation to the direct application of the EU competition rules by their NCAs.
Featured News
Google and South Carolina Clash Over State Records Demand
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
Telefonica Germany Teams Up with Amazon Web Services to Migrate 5G Customers
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
Federal Judge Grants $7.4 Million Settlement in Pork Price-Fixing Case
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
Wilson Sonsini Bolsters Antitrust and Competition Practice with Key Partner Returns
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
EU to Scrutinize Telecom Italia’s Network Sale to KKR
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Economics of Criminal Antitrust
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Navigating Economic Expert Work in Criminal Antitrust Litigation
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
The Increased Importance of Economics in Cartel Cases
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
A Law and Economics Analysis of the Antitrust Treatment of Physician Collective Price Agreements
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Information Exchange In Criminal Antitrust Cases: How Economic Testimony Can Tip The Scales
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI