Epic Games CEO Tim Sweeney has declared his intention to pursue additional legal action against tech giant Apple, just days after the US Supreme Court rejected further appeals from both parties regarding a 2021 California court ruling in the Epic vs. Apple antitrust lawsuit.
The protracted legal battle began in August 2020 when Epic Games initiated court proceedings against Apple following the revocation of Epic’s Fortnite developer account. Apple’s decision to block the popular game’s distribution on its devices came after Epic intentionally bypassed the contractually mandated App Store payment mechanisms embedded in its Fortnite iOS app. This strategic move aimed to circumvent Apple’s 30 percent platform fees.
The final verdict on Epic’s lawsuit was delivered in September 2021 by Judge Gonzalez-Rogers, who ruled against Epic in nine out of its ten claims. The judge determined that Epic had failed to substantiate its argument that Apple held a monopoly, as defined by antitrust laws. However, Gonzalez-Rogers did side with Epic on one crucial matter, stating that Apple could not prohibit developers from including links to alternative payment methods within their apps—a practice commonly referred to as “anti-steering.”
Related: Supreme Court Rejects Apple’s Appeal, Paving the Way for App Store Payment Revolution
Undeterred by the recent Supreme Court dismissal, Tim Sweeney expressed his commitment to challenging Apple’s practices. The legal battle revolves around the contentious issue of Apple’s control over its App Store and the associated fees imposed on developers.
Epic Games has consistently argued that Apple’s App Store policies stifle competition and innovation, and Sweeney’s determination to continue the fight suggests a willingness to challenge the status quo within the tech industry.
As the legal saga between Epic Games and Apple unfolds, the implications for the broader app development and distribution landscape remain significant. The industry is watching closely as these two tech giants clash over issues that extend beyond their specific dispute, influencing the future dynamics of app ecosystems and antitrust regulations.
Source: Euro Games
Featured News
Trump Nominates Olivia Trusty for FCC Commissioner Role Ahead of Inauguration
Jan 16, 2025 by
CPI
Lawyers Claim eXp’s Settlement Tactics Hurt Antitrust Case Potential
Jan 16, 2025 by
CPI
Amex GBT Pushes Back Against DOJ Lawsuit Over CWT Acquisition
Jan 16, 2025 by
CPI
Belgium Opens Antitrust Probe into AB InBev’s Market Practices
Jan 16, 2025 by
CPI
Tech Groups Sue CFPB Over New Rule on Digital Wallet Oversight
Jan 16, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand